Mexico: New evaluation option for new compositions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: New evaluation option for new compositions

In February 2017, new guidelines were published by the Federal Commission for the Protection Against Sanitary Risks (COFEPRIS) that should be followed by medicaments or drugs considered as new molecules before the new molecules committee for evaluation, including the non-person modalities.

Such guidelines define if a drug or medicine should be evaluated under the person modalities or non-person modalities, according to the current law and the risk, complexity or nature of the product.

It is worth mentioning that the committee of new molecules for evaluation define that a new molecule is a natural or synthetic substance that is an active drug in a medicine, not previously used in Mexico, wherein the safety, effectiveness and therapeutic uses are not completely documented in the scientific bibliography.

On the other hand, consider that the previous practice to evaluate a medicine was under person modalities, wherein the applicant for a drug or medicine together with his committee appear before the New Molecules Committee presenting the information to support the quality, safety and effectiveness of product.

With the non-person modalities, the applicant should prove to COFEPRIS the information to support the quality, safety and effectiveness of a product to be evaluated without appearing before the Committee of New Molecules.

The considerations that the applicant should take into account about the characteristics of the product are:

a) first marketing authorisation in the world;

b) new marketing authorisation in Mexico (product authorised by other country);

c) new combination with a fixed dose; and

d) therapeutic indication (including: bordering of therapeutic indication, changes in the treatment line).

If the product was evaluated by some international sanitary agency with which COFEPRIS has an agreement, the applicant should consider the option of non-present modalities. Some such agencies are the Food and Drug Administration of USA (FDA), Health Canada, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic).

Agustin Azcatl

Olivares

Pedro Luis Ogazón No 17

Col San Angel

01000 México DF

Tel: +5255 53 22 30 00

Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01

olivlaw@olivares.com.mx

www.olivares.com.mx

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AIPPI has pulled the plug on its planned 2027 World Congress, and INTA has seemingly committed to hosting a meeting there, but the concerns won’t abate
Despite being outspent by a wealthy opponent, a trial attorney at King & Spalding says ‘relentless pursuit of the truth’ helped his team secure a $420m damages award for mobile gaming client
190 drugs face loss of exclusivity between 2026 and 2030, with the list including Bristol Myers Squibb’s blood-thinning drug Eliquis and immunotherapy medication Opdivo
Nokia, represented by a team from Bird & Bird, adjudged to have made fair offer to Asus and Acer in UK SEP dispute
Azhar Sadique and Kane Ridley, who founded the London office in 2023, are now both working in legal tech and AI-related roles, while another UK-based lawyer has also left
Partner Pierre Pérot rejoins the firm he left in 2022 alongside another returning lawyer, associate Camille Abba
Vaping dispute, in which Stobbs and Brandsmiths are the representatives, tested how the UK's Human Rights Act can apply to injunctions restraining unjustified threats
An AI platform being sold for £40m, and lateral hires involving law firms Womble Bond Dickinson and Cadwell Thomas were among the top talking points
With the London Annual Meeting behind us, we look back at some of the lessons learned this week and ahead to what 2027 will bring
In-house counsel aren’t impressed with law firms’ international networks, but practitioners say they are crucial for business
Gift this article