All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 Managing IP is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Thailand: Impact of international patent developments

On May 5 2017, the Thai Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) issued two announcements in regard to patent processes in Thailand: (1) Announcement on the Establishment of a List of International Search Authorities and International Preliminary Examining Authorities (No 2); and (2) Announcement on Fees for International Applications, International Searches, Delivery of International Applications and Late Payment of Fees.

The first announcement specifies the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) among the list of International Search Authorities (ISA) and the International Preliminary Examining Authorities (IPEA), while the second announcement establishes new fees for international applications, which have been adjusted to reflect the current fee rates charged by the listed ISAs and the current currency exchange rates.

These two developments reflect the continued positive steps being taken by the DIP to create greater efficiencies and to upgrade patent processes, as well as to clear the patent backlog that poses a constant obstacle to timely patent prosecution in Thailand.

IPOS as ISA and IPEA

The DIP's Announcement on the Establishment of a List of International Search Authorities and International Preliminary Examining Authorities (No 2) confirms the IPOS as a body qualified as an ISA and an IPEA for international applications filed in Thailand.

According to the search fees outlined in the Announcement on Fees for International Applications, International Searches, Delivery of International Applications and Late Payment of Fees, fees for searches conducted by IPOS are the third highest after the United States Patent and Trademark Office and the European Patent Office at ฿61,000 ($1,720) without the possibility of a reduced rate. However, numerous possible advantages of using the IPOS as the ISA and IPEA should not be overlooked. As IPOS's turnaround time to issue a first office action is approximately 60 days, and the Office is able to review prior art published only in Chinese as part of the search and examination process, the use of IPOS as the ISA and IPEA represents a fast and thorough search process. IPOS is also used as the ISA and IPEA for PCT applications filed with the United States, Japan, Mexico, Brunei, Indonesia, Laos or Vietnam as the receiving office.

Amended fees for international patent applications

The Announcement on Fees for International Patent Applications, International Searches, Delivery of International Applications and Late Payment of Fees establishes new fees, which have been adjusted to reflect the current fee rates charged by the listed ISAs and the current currency exchange rates.

According to this Announcement, the international application paper filing fee in Thailand is set at ฿53,000 ($1,430) for the first 30 pages of the application and ฿750 ($22) per subsequent additional page. Further, the online filing fees have been adjusted to between ฿41,000 and ฿49,000 ($1,155 to $1,380) depending on the electronic file types in which the documents are submitted. Reduced rates are available for applicants who are nationals of or reside in certain countries, as specified under the PCT.

Overall, the fees have been slightly reduced from the previously applicable rates in order to reflect the exchange fluctuations. Additionally, the search fees for each qualified ISA have been reduced as well, except for the Japan Patent Office and the Australia Patent Office. Such fee reductions will be beneficial for all patent applicants.



Daniel Greif

Dhanasun Chumchuay

Spruson & Ferguson

Nos. 496-502 Amarin Plaza BuildingUnit Nos. 1806-1807, 18th Floor, Ploenchit Road, Lumpini Sub-District, Pathumwan District, Bangkok 10330 Thailand

Tel: +66 2 305 6893

mail.asia@spruson.com

www.spruson.com


more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sources say the Supreme Court’s decision to take on Sky v SkyKick puts uncertainty back into the mix, just when IP owners thought they knew what was what
Charles Feng, partner at East & Concord in Beijing, explains why filing for a trademark early is still a brand’s best bet
Counsel at IBM, Novartis, BMS and four other companies delve into whether the new Section 101 bill addresses their concerns
Clearance searches are especially important when counsel can’t rely on the USPTO’s opinion before key deadlines, say sources
VLSI case halted in Delaware; Netflix sues Bridgerton rip-off; Ex-GSK scientist escapes damages; US Copyright Office debuts new software; Abbvie scores Humira patent thicket win; Russia tables bill on illegal blocking of copyrighted content
An England and Wales High Court judgment over a disclosure error shows why law firms must never play a distant role when advising clients
Italy is in pole position to replace London as a central division host but must weather a political storm first
The senator’s proposed Section 101 legislation would cut down on exceptions to patent eligibility in the US
Ken Korea, founder of Colev Law and former head of US IP at Samsung, sets out the problems with anti-suit injunctions and the problem of getting rid of them
Thom Tillis and Patrick Leahy introduced a bill that would evaluate the need for recording examiner interviews, among other measures
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree