The Philippines: A poem as proof of intent

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The Philippines: A poem as proof of intent

Finally, the highly publicised case regarding the construction of the 49 storey residential condominium building called Torre de Manila (pictured) as marring the view of the statue of the Philippines' national hero Jose Rizal has come to an end. On April 25 2017, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition for injunction filed by the Knights of Rizal (KOR), a "civic, patriotic, cultural, non-partisan, non-sectarian and non-profit organisation" against the developer DMCI Homes Inc, City of Manila, National Commission for Culture and the Arts, et al (GR No 213948). The petition was filed by KOR on September 12 2014 which argued that the completed Torre de Manila would "forever ruin the sightline of the Rizal Monument in Luneta Park" since it would "loom at the back and overshadow the entire monument, whether up close or viewed from a distance". The KOR also argued that the building is nuisance per se; and that the Rizal Monument as a National Treasure is entitled to full protection of the law.

From Mocha Balita

In dismissing the petition, the Supreme Court held that there is no law prohibiting the construction of the Torre de Manila; that there is no allegation or proof that the Torre de Manila project is "contrary to morals, customs and public order" or that it brings harm, danger or hazard to the community; there is nothing that disallows the construction of a building outside the boundaries of a historic site or facility, where such building may affect the background of a historic site. In this case, the Torre de Manila stands 870 metres outside and to the rear of the Rizal Monument and "cannot possibly obstruct the front view of the Rizal Monument". Likewise, the Torre de Manila is not in an area that has been declared as an "anthropological or archealogical area" or in an area designated as a heritage zone, cultural property, historical landmark or national treasure by the National Historical Commission.

As a final word, the Supreme Court quoted some lines from Rizal's poem Mi Ultimo Adios, which expressed Rizal's wish to die facing the rising sun:

Yo muero cuando veo que el cielo se colora Y al fin anuncia el dia tras lobrego capuz

(I die just when I see the dawn break, Through the gloom of night, to herald the day)

History would show that at his execution, Rizal was made to stand facing west towards Manila Bay, with his back to the firing squad like a traitor, despite his request that he face his executioners. When he was shot, he turned around to face the east, falling on his back with the rising sun on his face.

The Supreme Court said: "The Rizal Monument is expressly against Rizal's own wishes. That Rizal's statue now stands facing west towards Manila Bay, with Rizal's back to the east, adds salt to the wound ... On the other hand, if Rizal's statue is made to face east, as Rizal had desired when he was about to be shot, the background – the blue sky above Manila Bay – would forever be clear of obstruction, and we would be faithful to Rizal's dying wish."

Editha R Hechanova

Hechanova & Co., Inc.

Salustiana D. Ty Tower

104 Paseo de Roxas Avenue

Makati City 1229, Philippines

Tel: (63) 2 812-6561

Fax: (63) 2 888-4290

editharh@hechanova.com.ph    

www.hechanova.com.ph

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners at Foley Hoag examine how recent CJEU jurisprudence may serve as a catalyst for recalibrating US judicial reluctance to entertain foreign patent claims
International law firms have high hopes for their IP practices in Saudi Arabia, with many opening offices, but recruiting and retaining talent in the Kingdom presents unique challenges
Patrick Ogola joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss helping African entrepreneurs on the global stage, and explains why young lawyers should speak up
Heli Pihlajamaa, the EPO’s principal director for patent law and procedures, joins us to take stock of the unitary patent following its second anniversary
Kelly Thompson, chair of South African firm Adams & Adams, discusses self-belief, self-doubt, and the importance of saying yes
The renowned food brands were represented by a host of lawyers, including members of the firms’ IP teams
Partners at Bird & Bird and Taylor Wessing discuss how Saudi Arabia offers unique opportunities for firms dealing in IP and tech
Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Gift this article