All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 Managing IP is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.
Unitary Patent & UPC

Germany's UPC Agreement ratification progress put on hold


The Office of the Federal President has agreed to hold off signing the approved laws necessary for the ratification of the UPC Agreement until a court case has been decided

Role of this Court and why now?

The role of this particular Court is to uphold the German constitution (Grundgesetz). A citizen or company who believes that their fundamental rights in Germany have been or will be infringed by an act of any branch of government or legislation can file a constitutional complaint with the Court. There are certain strict procedures to follow before a case can be heard by this Court.

The Court can review the merits of a constitutional complaint and decide whether to admit it or not. If admitted, it has the power to review and declare an action or legislation unconstitutional. Its decision is final. To read more see here.

In 2014 German IP practitioner Ingve Björn Stjerna wrote an essay which explored whether the EPC and the UPCA are open to a possible challenge before the German Constitutional Court. In the essay Stjerna said that such an action against the UPCA is likely to be admitted for review by the court just before its ratification.

It is worth a read.

The court case is a constitutional complaint (number 2 BVR 739/17) before the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) concerning the UPC Agreement. The complaint was accompanied by an application for an injunction.

Hendrik Wieduwilt‏ of Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) broke the news on Twitter: “EXCLUSIVE: @BVerfG stops single EU patent; Karlsruhe has asked BuPräsidenten not to sign laws… [translated].” 

The Court's office has confirmed to Managing IP that no decision has been made but there is an agreement between the Court and the Office of the President. "During a phone call the Office of the Federal President then assured the rapporteur of not entering into certifying the law until a decision has been issued," the Court's office said.

Asked when a decision is expected, the Court's office explained: "The case will be reviewed with the appropriate urgency as the constitutional complaint was accompanied by a motion for a temporary injunction."

Information about this case is not yet on the Court's website and we’re yet to receive a response from the German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection. 


This news took many by surprise, as comments on Twitter show. It comes at a critical time when Germany has all but completed the procedures to be ready for UPC Agreement (UPCA) ratification, slated before the end of this year.

The German Parliament (Bundestag) has already passed the necessary pieces of legislation, which have also been approved by the Federal Council (Bundesrat). The remaining key steps required are for the German president and government to sign them into law and publication in the Bundesgesetzblatt (Law Gazette).

The identity of the complainant and the grounds for the complaint are not yet known. But once again the UPCA is under judicial scrutiny. Together with the UK election fallout, this development may further delay the project.

You can follow our coverage of the Unitary Patent and UPC, including our new series of UPC case scenarios, at 

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

ITC counsel explain why companies will continue to bring trade secret complaints to the venue and talk about how to tackle challenges
Google and Sonos patent war continues; CNIPA finishes first administrative patent trials; Oppo halts German sales after Nokia wins; Chugai settles Fresenius suit; Taylor Swift claims she never heard Playas Gon’ Play; AI can’t be inventor, says Federal Circuit
Brands and retailers should educate their marketing departments and get help from their sales teams so private label products don’t become a major problem
The UK government wants to stop local tech going to China, but tech transfer offices often have few options
Hubertus Schacht of the Munich Regional Court shares his thoughts on German SEP trends and their influence on the UPC
Trademark counsel applaud the EUIPO’s new filing system but reveal it has come with teething issues
The executive vice president of partnerships and acquisitions at the NPE explains how his company’s deal with Intel came to be
South Korean lawyers welcome the trademark guidelines but say the appellate board, courts, and other IP offices may not necessarily agree with the KIPO
Lawyers for Craig Wright will seek approval for expert evidence to help the England and Wales High Court understand how autism affects his character
IP counsel say rude judges can dent their confidence but that the effect on clients should not be underestimated
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree