Thailand: 20-year IP Roadmap published
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Thailand: 20-year IP Roadmap published

On January 26 2017, the Thai Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) published the long-awaited 20-year Intellectual Property Roadmap, providing directions for the country's IP developments over the next two decades. In Thailand, there is still room for improvement in terms of developing a completely robust IP legal framework, IP resources, effective IP enforcement mechanisms and a strong understanding of IP.

Given the current national policy of moving the basis of the country's economy away from production efficiency and toward innovation, IP has become an essential instrument in achieving such a critical shift. The Roadmap is intended to energise IP awareness within Thailand and a positive impact on global business operators is certainly expected.

The Roadmap specifies developments in six interlinked IP areas: (1) IP creation, (2) IP protection, (3) IP commercialisation, (4) IP enforcement, (5) geographical indications (GIs) and (6) genetic resources (GRs), traditional knowledge (TK) and traditional cultural expressions (TCEs). These can be re-grouped into three principal concepts.

Creating an IP-conducive economic environment

The Roadmap aims to enhance IP creation through human resource development, strengthening the research infrastructure and promoting market-oriented research. These measures are designed to invigorate the technological advancements and innovations of Thai companies.

However, global companies will also benefit from a more sophisticated innovation and technological infrastructure, brought about by greater understanding of IP by Thai businesses and consumers, as well as by enhanced efforts to match Thai businesses with identified technological and innovation synergies.

Local resources will also be more accessible, as encouraged registration of GIs, TK and TCEs will increase opportunities to link local producers to national and international markets.

Facilitation of registration processes

The goal in this regard is to adapt the existing IP registration systems into faster processes conforming to international standards, with effective and user-friendly information technology systems. This will be achieved through increasing the number and raising the professional training level of patent examiners and trade mark registrars, in order to better manage the ever-increasing workload. Online filing and documentation systems will be improved and the intra-DIP workflow will be optimised.

In recent years there have been various initiatives aimed at facilitating registration. The Facilitation Act, the Copyright Amendment Act and the Trade Mark Amendment Act represent attempts at overhauling the legal framework and enhancing the efficiency of the IP registration processes. Further, the DIP had already planned to increase the number of patent examiners from 39 to 127 and of trade mark registrars from 20 to 40 in 2016. The experience of IP registration service providers in Thailand suggests that these attempts are taking effect, albeit slowly.

Effective enforcement

IP enforcement has in recent years become a household topic, as the volume of counterfeits and infringing goods confiscated and destroyed in public ceremonies, which are covered on national news, increases year by year. The Roadmap aims to reinforce this new sense of moral and legal wrong associated with IP infringement while improving efficiencies and coordination among the numerous public bodies involved in IP enforcement and raising IP knowledge by all personnel involved in IP matters. The Roadmap will provide greater comfort to global businesses operating in Thailand as they will see an increased focus on stopping infringing and counterfeiting activity.

The Roadmap's optimistic and ambitious aims will be welcomed by IP owners both within and outside of Thailand. However, specific measures as to how the IP Roadmap will be implemented are yet to be formulated, implemented and assessed. Nonetheless, with the Thai government's sharp focus on economic remodeling, IP has been prioritised as an essential part of the government's vision for a modernised Thai economy, as Via Appia was to Rome: a highway inviting increased and beneficial commerce and innovation.

Daniel Greif

Dhanasun Chumchuay


Spruson & FergusonNos. 496-502 Amarin Plaza BuildingUnit Nos. 1806-1807, 18th Floor, Ploenchit Road, Lumpini Sub-District, Pathumwan District, Bangkok 10330 ThailandTel: +66 2 305 6893mail.asia@spruson.comwww.spruson.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Loes van den Winkel, attorney at Arnold & Siedsma, explains why clients' enthusiasm is contagious and why her job does not mean managing fashion models
Allen & Gledhill partner Jia Yi Toh shares her experience of representing the winning team in the first-ever case filed under Singapore’s new fast-track IP dispute resolution system
In-house lawyers reveal how they balance cost, quality, and other criteria to get the most from their relationships with external counsel
Dario Pietrantonio of Robic discusses growth opportunities for the firm and shares insights from his journey to managing director
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Practitioners analyse a survey on how law firms prove value to their clients and reflect on why the concept can be hard to pin down
The winner of Managing IP’s Life Achievement Award discusses 50 years in IP law and how even he can’t avoid imposter syndrome
Gift this article