Argentina: Full compensation for damage in trade mark infringement
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: Full compensation for damage in trade mark infringement

IP rights – among which is the right of the trade mark owner– enable the holder to exploit with exclusivity certain intangible assets. Every time a misappropriation or trade mark infringement takes place, the owner of the trade mark that is subject to infringement also suffers damage, due to the simple fact that a third party is using a similar or identical trade mark without their consent.

In this regard, judges must adopt a broad criterion when applying the remedy of damages, even when it is difficult to prove those damages concretely.

Obtaining full compensation for the damage caused will discourage the violation of any IP rights by infringers. When applying these laws, judges should therefore endeavour to facilitate proper damages to a greater extent in cases of infringement.

Recent decision

In that sense, it is worth mentioning the recent decision of Division I of the Federal Court of Appeals in Civil and Commercial Matters in H I v DITOYS SA on Cease of use of Trade mark of August 16 2016 that provides a good example of such facilitation.


In relation to the damages suffered, considering that the defendant made inappropriate use of the plaintiff's trade mark, the first instance judge understood that it was very difficult to accurately prove the loss on the basis of the decrease in the plaintiff's income – because this depended on multiple factors. Thus, he argued that the person that acts improperly has to take the risk of the uncertainty generated by their own action, otherwise there would be a thread of impunity around trade mark infringements.

"Once the existence of infringement has been proven, experience, case-law and doctrine affirm that the trade mark owner suffers damage. Undoubtedly, difficulties are encountered when it comes to proving the damage caused in the field of industrial property. Thus, it would be correct to start from presumed damages."

In its decision, the Court confirmed that the remedy of damages is according to law and also sustained the plaintiff's request and increased significantly the amount for damage compensation.

Daniel R Zuccherino

Obligado & Cia

Paraguay 610, 17th Floor

C1057AAH, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Tel: +54 11 4114 1100

Fax: +54 11 4311 5675

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Pravin Anand and Vaishali Mittal of Anand & Anand explain how they helped Swiss pharma company Vifor secure a landmark win against generic companies in India
Malisheia Douglas, who spent six years at Eaton Corporation, said she was attracted by the firm's global footprint
The European Parliament has voted in favour of overhauling the SEP framework, a proposal that has sparked deep division among patent owners and implementers
Daniel Poh talks about his journey to becoming managing partner and how firms can win new business from Chinese companies
Missing a deadline can have serious consequences but law firms should consider being lenient to those responsible
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
CMS, which was told to respond to a cancellation action by February 12 but filed its response a day later, has rowed back on claims about an IT error
The deal could help Rouse gain a foothold in Australia and New Zealand for the first time
With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
Gift this article