Germany: Protecting and enforcing data formats for the IoT
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Protecting and enforcing data formats for the IoT

In Germany, products that are directly obtained by a patent-protected process are entitled to patent protection according to Section 9, Sentence 2 (3) PatG, even if a claim directed to the product is lacking in the patent. To obtain extended protection, according to German practice, it is a necessary condition that the product as such would at least be accessible to patent protection.

In the reported decision BGH – X ZR 124/15 – Rezeptortyrosinkinase II, the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) resolved the question of allowing product protection for data directly obtained by a patent-protected process. Thus, the BGH had to rule on the issue of technical character and patentability of data, an important aspect of the discussion about patent eligibility of computer-implemented inventions in general.

The BGH stressed in its decision that a sequence of data can only be considered as a patent-infringing product which has been produced directly by a patent-protected process if the product has tangible and technical characteristics that have been induced by the process. In particular, the BGH considered that technical character is not to be awarded for data as a set of values providing information contents and in the case in question the court denied infringement. However, the BGH stated that a data format is technical and, therefore, eligible for patent protection. The decision follows the approach adopted in earlier court rulings affirming the technical character of data structures and file formats, as provided by BGH – X ZR 33/10 – MPEG-2-Videosignalcodierung. The decision is furthermore in line with case law of the European Patent Office according to which a computer-implemented data format is deemed to have technical character (T 1194/97).

A first conclusion to be drawn from the BGH – X ZR 124/15 decision is that it is worth claiming data structures or file formats when drafting a patent application, since data structures or file formats comprise technical character.

Second, when enforcing patent claims related to data structures or file formats, instead of enforcing claims directed to network entities or to systems, complicated issues such as joint, divided or indirect infringement might become obsolete. Although multiple actors or network elements may be involved in a distributed computing environment, data structures and file formats are basically used and processed by each actor or network element independently, an aspect which essentially simplifies resolving patent infringement disputes in complex network environments of connected and smart devices, such as the Internet of Things.

Simon Lud

Maiwald Patentanwalts GmbHElisenhof, Elisenstr 3D-80335, Munich, GermanyTel: +49 89 74 72 660 Fax: +49 89 77 64

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Malisheia Douglas, who spent six years at Eaton Corporation, said she was attracted by the firm's global footprint
The European Parliament has voted in favour of overhauling the SEP framework, a proposal that has sparked deep division among patent owners and implementers
Daniel Poh talks about his journey to becoming managing partner and how firms can win new business from Chinese companies
Missing a deadline can have serious consequences but law firms should consider being lenient to those responsible
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
CMS, which was told to respond to a cancellation action by February 12 but filed its response a day later, has rowed back on claims about an IT error
The deal could help Rouse gain a foothold in Australia and New Zealand for the first time
With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
Gift this article