The Philippines: Opposition fails despite applicant in default
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The Philippines: Opposition fails despite applicant in default

It is a common assumption that when the respondent in an opposition case is declared in default for failure to file his answer, and the hearing officer decides on the basis of the evidence submitted by the opposer, the respondent loses and his trade mark application is rejected. That was not the case in Smith & Nephew Inc v Livingstone Healthcare Corp docketed as IPC No 14-2014-00176 decided by the Bureau of Legal Affairs (BLA) of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) on February 1 2017. The contested application was for the mark Adler covering surgical instruments, filed by Livingstone in 2013.

In its opposition Smith & Nephew traced its origin over 150 years ago starting as a small pharmacy in Hull, England, which came to be known as T J Smith and Nephew 40 years later after the founder was joined by his nephew Horatio Nelson Smith before his death. The company acquired several companies specialising in orthopaedics, wound management and sports medicine and trauma, and in 2013 it acquired Adler Mediequip Privale Limited, manufacturer and distributor of mid-tier orthopaedic products in the areas of trauma, intramedullary nailing, spine, reconstruction and anthroscopy. Adler Mediequip, which was initially a part of the Sushrut Adler Group of Companies, extensively used and promoted the mark Adler first in India where it had a distribution network of 150 distributors, then in the rest of Asia and parts of eastern Europe. Even before its purchase by Smith and Nephew, the mark Adler was already in 29 countries. In its opposition, Smith and Nephew submitted an affidavit of Louis Strudwick with annexes and website printouts.

The BLA issued a notice to answer to Livingstone in August 2014, but the latter did not submit its answer and was declared in default on January 13 2015.

In its review of the evidence submitted by the opposer Smith & Nephew, the BLA did not find any connection between the opposer and the mark Adler. Hence, the BLA dismissed the opposition and ruled:

Annexes "A" to "I" of Strudwick's affidavit pertain to the Opposer's history and awards while Annex "J" and "K" details the history and/or background of Sushrut Surgicals Pvt Ltd and Adler Mediequip Pvt Ltd, respectively. However, none of these documents proves the Opposer's claim that it acquired Adler Mediequip Private Limited in 2013. The rest of the annexes of Strudwick's affidavit and the remaining website printouts likewise fail to corroborate such claim. Even the supposed communications with Philippine distributors of "ADLER" products do not show the Opposer's participation in the said transactions as only the name of Sushrut Surgicals Pvt Ltd appears in these documents.

Absent any proof that the Opposer indeed acquired Adler Mediequip Private Limited, it cannot inure benefit of the latter's alleged use and/or ownership of the mark "ADLER". Since neither did it present proof its own actual use of the "ADLER" mark before the filing of the contested application, the opposition must fail. In so ruling, this Adjudication Officer simply defers to the basic rule in evidence that each party must prove his affirmative allegation. The basic rule is that mere allegation is not evidence, and is not equivalent to proof.

Editha R Hechanova

Hechanova & Co., Inc.

Salustiana D. Ty Tower

104 Paseo de Roxas Avenue

Makati City 1229, Philippines

Tel: (63) 2 812-6561

Fax: (63) 2 888-4290

editharh@hechanova.com.ph  

www.hechanova.com.ph

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In the first of a two-part UPC special, lawyers at A&O Shearman explain what you need to know about changes of procedural language and security for costs
Lawyers in the US and Europe reveal the work they focus on, how they stay one step ahead of creative counterfeiters, and why reputation matters
Abion said the appointment of Silvia Asioli and the launch of its Milan office will expand its market position in southern Europe
UK firms who have hired litigation and transactional lawyers reveal how they work together and the lessons have they learned
Jonah Mitchell tells us why he would have liked to have tried his hand at being a firefighter or chef
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA’s International Amicus Committee, explains why we might not have heard the last of the morality debate
Counsel say the USPTO's examples of AI patentability should make their lives easier and help point clients in the right direction
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Ehsun Forghany says he was impressed by the firm's focus on fashion and IP as well as the expertise of chairman Anthony Lupo
Counsel at medical device companies say the unitary patent, AI and terminal disclaimers are major areas of concern
Gift this article