Taiwan: Downton Abbey protected as famous mark
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Taiwan: Downton Abbey protected as famous mark

In the past, although the IP Office recognised the fame enjoyed by popular movies, such recognition did not render these titles to be famous marks by default. Nowadays, considering that the production companies of well-received movies or TV shows are apt to release many tie-in products and that a box office hit often promises high public awareness, the IP Office has made it clear in Article 4.7 of the Examination Guidelines on Distinctiveness of Trade Marks that "[t]he titles of works, including books, films, and dramas, shall be deemed to have acquired their distinctiveness if, after extensive exposure, they have implanted a vivid impression in the minds of consumers". On this score, the copyright owners or parties with the copyright owner's consent are entitled to register such titles as trade marks.

On November 6 2013, an application was filed for the mark 唐頓莊園 Downton Abbey in class 33 in respect of alcohol, wine and the like, and the application later matured into registration number 1643707. However, during the opposition period, Carnival Films (the production company of the British drama "Downton Abbey") filed an opposition against the registration, claiming that Downton Abbey/唐頓莊園 (the Chinese translation of Downton Abbey) is not only the title of a successful television series but also a famous mark owned by Carnival Films.

After a review of the case, the IP Office rendered a decision in favour of the opposer and the decision was upheld by the Board of Appeals.

The owner of registration number 1643707 thus filed a petition for administrative litigation with the IP Court. During the litigation proceedings, the owner did not deny the popularity of the television series Downton Abbey. Instead, it argued that Downton Abbey/唐頓莊園 was merely the title of a show and had not been used as a trade mark. In addition, since alcohol, wine and the like covered by registration number 1643707 are remote in nature from "TV programme production service or video tapes/books of TV shows" offered/sold by the opposer in accordance with the Manual of Classification of Goods/Services published by the IP Office, the owner averred that the two parties' goods/services are not in competitive proximity and registration of the opposed mark 唐頓莊園Downton Abbey in class 33 is unlikely to engender a likelihood of consumer confusion in the marketplace.

Registration number 1643707 was eventually cancelled. The IP Court ruled that Downton Abbey/唐頓莊園 had established its reputation through extensive exposure since it is the title of a popular TV show with a large audience and the opposer has diversified its business by launching, among other things, alcohol and wine under the mark Downton Abbey in the marketplace. Therefore, registration of the opposed mark in class 33 in respect of alcohol, wine and the like is likely to engender consumer confusion and disparage the reputation of the opposer's famous mark.

Julia Y M Hung

Saint Island International Patent & Law Offices7th Floor, No. 248, Section 3Nanking East RoadTaipei 105-45, Taiwan, ROCTel: +886 2 2775 1823Fax: +886 2 2731 6377siiplo@mail.saint-island.com.twwww.saint-island.com.tw

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The FRAND rate is only 5 cents higher than the per-device rate determined at first instance in 2023
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Nearly four months after joining Crowell & Moring, Edward Taelman reflects on starting afresh, new clients, and firm culture
Firms discuss the ebb and flow of life sciences IP work and explain how they help professionals pivot between specialities
Mercedes-Benz, Dolby Laboratories, and Panasonic discuss the merits and drawbacks of the USPTO's terminal disclaimer proposal
In-house counsel believe Chinese domestic firms are becoming as sophisticated as international firms, but they may not shift their portfolios just yet
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is looking to renew a ban that has prevented Judge Pauline Newman from hearing cases
The list of the top representative firms at the UPC may yield few surprises but their success did not come free
The German firms have accounted for 26% of all infringement actions, while US corporations appear interested in litigating at the forum, a report has revealed
Vincent Brault tells us how he fits kitesurfing into his lunchtime routine and why IP is no longer seen as ‘nerdy’
Gift this article