Mexico: Substitution by a posterior international registration

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Substitution by a posterior international registration

In accordance with Article 4bis (1) of the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks, a national registration can be replaced by its posterior international trade mark registration. This provision concerns the situation where a trade mark that is subject of a national registration is also subject of an international registration designating the same country and applies when both registrations stand in the name of the same person and cover identical goods or services.

In the same sense, Article 4 bis (1) indicates that the following conditions must be met:

  • the protection resulting from the international registration extends to the said contracting party under Article 3ter (1) or (2);

  • all the goods and services listed in the national or regional registration are also listed in the international registration in respect of the said contracting party,

  • such extension takes effect after the date of the national or regional registration.

As provided by Article 4bis §2 of the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning International Registration of Marks, and upon request of the trade mark owner, the Mexican Trademark Office would be required to take note of this replacement in its register of international trade mark registrations.

In view of the above and in order to ascertain that the rights obtained through the national registration for the concerned goods or services remain valid even after the said earlier right would not be renewed at the next renewal due date the substitution has to be requested through a brief filed before the Mexican Trademark Office. We have recently filed a petition requesting our authorities to take note of a substitution of a national registration by a posterior international registration and await their response taking note of this request.

Liliana Rojas


OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01olivlaw@olivares.com.mxwww.olivares.com.mx

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

While IP Australia’s updated manual could be favourable to computer-implemented inventions, stakeholders would like to see whether a consistent and reliable standard is followed during actual examination
UKIPO will remain a competitive option as long as efficient service continues
A future opt-out has not been ruled out, but practitioners warn that the UK could fall behind in the AI race
US patent lawyers say they are increasingly advising clients on China strategies as corporations seek to gain leverage in enforcement, licensing, and supply chain management
Mike Rueckheim reunites with 12 of his former Winston & Strawn colleagues as King & Spalding continues aggressive hiring streak
As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
A team from White & Case has checked in on behalf of Premier Inn Hotels in a UK trademark and passing off case against a cookie brand
Litigation team says pre-trial work and a Section 101 defence helped significantly limit damages payable by ride-sharing firm Lyft in patent case
Gift this article