Singapore: IPOS lowers filing fees for IP protection
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Singapore: IPOS lowers filing fees for IP protection

The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) announced last month that the fees for patent search and examination reports and for trade mark applications will be reduced effective April 1 2017.

Requests for patent search and examination reports where the International Search Report or International Preliminary Examination Report has been established by IPOS under the Patents Cooperation Treaty (PCT) will see the largest decrease of 37%. IPOS has been acting as International Searching Authority (ISA) and International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) under the PCT since September 1 2015.

Patent applications where IPOS has not acted as ISA or IPEA will also see a fee decrease of 25% for requests for patent search and examination reports.

IPOS states that the announced fee decrease is part of the Office's efforts to support Singapore's innovators and make IP protection more affordable, in keeping with its vision to help drive innovation in Singapore.

While announcing the reduction in patent filing fees, IPOS also announced the introduction of an excess claim fee of S$40 ($28) per claim in excess of 20 claims from April 2017. The excess claim fee will apply when filing a request for examination and during payment of the grant fee.

According to IPOS, the implementation of the excess claim fee will help reduce the current burden on patent examiners. IPOS also observed that the average patent application has around 18 claims and thus they do not expect the excess claim fee to apply to most applicants.

Voluntary amendments can be made in Singapore any time before a request for examination has been made. In addition, it is important to note that Singapore accepts multiple dependent claims and, unlike other jurisdictions, it is permissible in Singapore for multiple dependent claims to refer to other multiple dependent claims. Accordingly, one should take advantage of such claim dependencies to cover important combinations of features or secondary inventive embodiments.

Despite the excess claim fee being paid at the time of requesting examination, IPOS would still require payment on excess claims when the patent application becomes granted. However, the excess claim fee payment at grant only applies to claims over and above those paid for during examination stage.

In addition to revision of patent fees, IPOS will reduce fees for applying for trade marks using a pre-approved list of goods and services by 30%.

IPOS Chief Executive Daren Tang said: "Singapore's innovation scene is becoming more vibrant, with more companies and start-ups seeking to create business value through IP. The fee revisions make it easier and cheaper for them to protect their brands and technology. We hope that more of our creative enterprises and inventors will be encouraged by these changes to have a strong foundation for taking their ideas to the world."

With the fees adjustment on April 1 2017, Singapore remains one of the most attractive countries for IP filing, with competitive rates compared to other major jurisdictions.

Maximilian Stelzer

Edwin Dai

Spruson & Ferguson (Asia) Pte Ltd152 Beach Road#37-05/06 Gateway EastSingapore 189721Tel: +65 6333 7200Fax: +65 6333

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A team of lawyers who joined Norton Rose Fulbright from Polsinelli say they were drawn to the firm's global platform
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers say a ruling concerning liability for trademark infringement could give company directors an easy way out and create litigation uncertainty
The LMG Life Sciences Awards announces the winners for the 5th annual awards
Some US lawyers have strengthened their connections with European firms as they help clients determine whether the UPC will become a 'centre of gravity'
In the latest episode, the team discusses the battle to take control of listed company and IP business Qantm IP, and looks at some recent hiring trends
To mark Mental Health Awareness Week, lawyers explain how they manage their mental health, and how they pluck up the courage to ask themselves difficult questions
IP lawyers unpick a case heard at the CJEU’s Grand Chamber this week that could potentially create a new world for litigation in Europe
A lawyer who replied to a cease-and-desist letter with just two words has shown others how to deal with vexatious infringement allegations
The suggested rule change surrounding terminal disclaimers could ease the burden on defendants, but risks complicating prosecution strategies
Gift this article