United Kingdom: Trade mark application for Should’ve

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

United Kingdom: Trade mark application for Should’ve

The well-known optical retail chain Specsavers have been hitting the headlines in the UK again. This time it is not for their successful court battles with British supermarket retailer and Wal-Mart subsidiary, Asda, which set an important precedent for the protection of colour trade marks, but for filing an application with the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) to have Should've and Shouldve registered as trade marks in classes 9, 10, 16, 35, and 44.

Specsavers applied to the UKIPO on July 18 2016 to register the two single words as a series of trade marks. This stems from the strapline of "should've gone to Specsavers" which Specsavers has been using since 2003 and has registered as an EU trade mark since 2007.

The UKIPO have accepted and published the application, which means that third parties had until October 12 to oppose the application. Indeed, six separate parties filed notices of threatened oppositions against the application within four days of the application being published, which would indicate that opposition proceedings against this application are likely.

Unsurprisingly, the UKIPO's acceptance of this application has met with severe criticism, as this could ultimately provide a monopoly in the single, commonly-used words, and prevent other companies from using the words as registered. Further criticism has been fired at the UKIPO for the broad scope of the five classes of goods and services for which registration was sought, seemingly beyond the remit of optical services, for example printed matter (class 16), which could provide considerable clout over printed retail services. The UKIPO has previously accepted single, commonly used words for registration but for far narrower specifications, such as Probably for classes 32 (lager; beer), 33 (alcoholic beverages) and 43 (services for providing food and drink), Always and Never, also to a narrow list of classes.

Beyond these concerns, Specsavers' decision to register Should've and Shouldve is relevant business strategy in light of the significant use and reliance of marketing on social media. Hashtags are commonly used to catalogue content, note trends and generate conversation and topics of discussion in broad sectors of the markets. For example, the hash tag #should've recently accompanied the full Specsavers catchphrase. Clearly any resulting registration for Should've and Shouldve will help Specsavers to control use of these marks in the full spectrum of social media.

Undoubtedly, many people will be monitoring Specsavers' application, with an increase in similar trade mark applications for single words likely should it be successful.

Chapman

Helga Chapman


Chapman + Co18 Staple GardensWinchester SO23 8SRUnited KingdomTel: +44 1962 600 500  info@chapmanip.com  www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article