Australia: No extraterritorial operation of Australian patents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: No extraterritorial operation of Australian patents

Australian courts have recently adopted a restrictive reading of the extra territorial operation of Australian patents.

In Load and Move Pty Ltd v Container Rotation Systems Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 843, the plaintiff owned a patent directed to a container rotation system. It sued the defendants, alleging infringement of the patent. The infringement allegation was peculiar. It alleged the defendants had contracted for the foreign manufacture in China of a container rotation system which was to be supplied to Eritrea. Thus the system was never going to enter the Australian territory, even though the supply was being orchestrated from Australia.

The judge refused to grant preliminary discovery and to entertain an infringement finding. As the contract for manufacture and sale was to be performed totally outside the jurisdiction, there was no exploitation of the patent for the purposes of infringement.

The case points to a restrictive reading by the Australian judiciary of the territorial operation of Australian patents. Given the rapid development of internet-type sales channels, this is perhaps unfortunate, as it may allow the effective exploitation of patent rights by Australian entities, provided that exploitation occurs wholly outside the country.

Peter Treloar


Shelston IP

Level 21, 60 Margaret Street

Sydney NSW 2000, Australia

Tel: +61 2 9777 1111

Fax: +61 2 9241 4666

email@shelstonip.com

www.shelstonip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

News of EasyGroup failing in its trademark infringement claim against ‘Easihire’ and Amgen winning a key appeal at the UPC were also among the top talking points
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by February 16 2026
Edward Russavage and Maria Crusey at Wolf Greenfield say that OpenAI MDL could broaden discovery and reshape how clients navigate AI copyright disputes
The UPC has increased some fees by as much as 32%, but firms and their clients had been getting a good deal so far
Meryl Koh, equity director and litigator at Drew & Napier in Singapore, discusses an uptick in cross-border litigation and why collaboration across practice areas is becoming crucial
The firm says new role will be at the forefront of how it delivers value and will help bridge the gap between lawyers, clients and tech
Qantm IP’s CEO and AI programme lead discuss the business’s investment and M&A plans, and reveal their tech ambitions
Controversial plans were scrapped by the Commission earlier this year after the Parliament had previously backed them
Lawyers at Spoor & Fisher provide an overview of how South Africa is navigating copyright and consent requirements to improve access to works for blind and visually impaired people
Gillian Tan explains how she balances TM portfolio management with fast-moving deals, and why ‘CCP’ is a good acronym to live by
Gift this article