Austria: Earth Wind & Fire trade mark dispute
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Austria: Earth Wind & Fire trade mark dispute

Earth Wind & Fire is the name of a music band founded in 1965 by the drummer Maurice White. Since 1975 that formation has celebrated worldwide successes and earned Grammies and gold- and platinum albums. The band became famous also in Austria and was famous at the time of priority (2003) of the attacked trade mark. It was from 1977 onwards in the Austrian charts, also at the time of priority. This was so irrespective of whether Maurice White played with his band at that time.

Al McKay joined that formation as guitarist later in 1973 and left it in 1981. He formed a band The Earth Wind & Fire Experience featuring the Al McKay all stars, whose name was registered as a trade mark in Austria with priority of 2003. This band made hundreds of concerts worldwide and also in Austria between 2004 and 2007. But in the media and its advertisements this formation was named Earth Wind & Fire without any additions. The defendant purported that it had registered this name as a trade mark to fight off tribute bands. It added the other words in order to differentiate itself from the original band and to emphasise that the key role is played by Al McKay with his experience in the original band.

Maurice White sued on different grounds, among them bad faith. The courts confirmed that the registration was made in bad faith. As a basis it was confirmed that Earth Wind & Fire is and was a famous trade mark in Austria and that the defendant had known this fact when filing its mark. Whether Al McKay might be himself famous is of no interest to this case. The fact that Al McKay was a member of the original formation does not justify an infringement in the rights of Maurice White with the aim to profit from its fame. It has apparently accepted a confusion with the famous mark.

Confusion is given when the earlier mark is fully contained in the latter mark as a separate entity. The services protected are anyway identical. Bad faith – the aim to profit from the fame of the earlier mark – need not to be the only reason for adopting the younger mark. There may exist other reasons besides it such as fighting off other pirates or protection of one's own interests. But that does not mitigate the abuse done by bad faith.

sonn.jpg

Helmut Sonn


SONN & PARTNER PatentanwälteRiemergasse 14A-1010 Vienna, AustriaTel: +43 1 512 84 05Fax: +43 1 512 98 05office@sonn.atwww.sonn.at

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Firms explain how monitoring, referrals and relationships with foreign firms helped them get more work at the TTAB
Luke Toft explains why he moved back to Fox Rothschild after working in-house at Sleep Number for five months
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
In a seminal ruling, the Beijing Internet Court said images generated by Stable Diffusion counted as original works
Boston-based John Lanza is hoping to work more with life sciences colleagues on the ‘exciting’ application of AI to drug discovery
The Delhi High Court has expressed its willingness to set global licensing terms in the Nokia-Oppo dispute, but it must deal with longstanding problems first
Some patent counsel are still encountering errors even though the USPTO has fully transitioned to the new system
A senior USPTO attorney spoke at a Nokia-sponsored event on the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation today, November 29
IP counsel are ‘flooded’ with queries from clients worried about deepfakes, but the law has so far come up short
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career