UK: Impact of Brexit on patents
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK: Impact of Brexit on patents

The UK has voted to leave the European Union, but how does this affect patents? Patents can be obtained in the UK via two separate means, either directly from the UK intellectual Office (UKIPO) which is governed by the UK Patents Act, or from the European Patent Office. Both organisations are unaffected by the UK leaving the EU. The European Patent Office is not an EU organisation, and already has members who are not member states of the EU such as Turkey, Norway and Switzerland.

UK patents, regardless of the system by which they were obtained (via the UKIPO or the EPO) are enforceable at the UKIPO and the UK courts.

The UK's potential exit from the EU does not change the current systems for obtaining patent protection in the UK, and the situation remains unchanged for patents granted by the UKIPO and European patents designating the UK. Patent applications pending before the UKIPO or the EPO will also continue as before.

Further, the enforcement of UK patents, regardless of the system under which they were obtained, will not be affected by Brexit.

European patent attorneys based in the UK will continue to represent applicants and patentees in all proceedings before the EPO and the UKIPO. This will continue once Brexit has actually taken place. So whether the UK is in, or out, of the EU will make very little difference to the present system of obtaining or enforcing patent protection in Europe.

European trade marks and designs may be affected as these are on offer only to countries which are member states of the EU, although it appears likely that a suitable extension agreement will be negotiated, so that these rights continue as before (perhaps similar to those extended to EEA member states).

European trade mark owners should consider keeping any UK national rights used in support of a seniority claim in force to ensure the best protection for the trade mark in the UK and may wish to consider filing national UK applications to guard against any eventuality.

Chapman_Helga

Helga Chapman


Chapman + Co18 Staple GardensWinchester SO23 8SRUnited KingdomTel: +44 1962 600 500  info@chapmanip.com www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Firms with a broad geographic reach are more likely to win work, especially from global companies with high turnovers, according to survey data of nearly 29,000 corporate counsel
IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals its latest rankings for trademark work today, including which firms are on the up
The 2024 firm rankings for trademark disputes and protection work are now available on ipstars.com
Highlights from Sunday included judicial insight from across the globe and a keynote address from Martin Luther King Jr’s daughter
Managing IP’s senior reporter Rani Mehta interviewed attendees at the INTA Annual Meeting in Atlanta about how they made the most out of their first day
A team of lawyers who joined Norton Rose Fulbright from Polsinelli say they were drawn to the firm's global platform
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers say a ruling concerning liability for trademark infringement could give company directors an easy way out and create litigation uncertainty
The LMG Life Sciences Awards announces the winners for the 5th annual awards
Some US lawyers have strengthened their connections with European firms as they help clients determine whether the UPC will become a 'centre of gravity'
Gift this article