Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Trade mark implications of new import requirements

Tax avoidance involving the import of undeclared trade marked items has led the Mexican Customs authorities to change the regulations governing the information that must be submitted.

Over the last few years the Mexican Customs authorities have detected an increasing importation problem of sub-valued goods. The problem arises when companies importing goods into the Mexican market do not mark the goods with the brand names they will be sold under.

In this way many companies were able to report a lower value of imported goods. The goods were not bearing any trade mark, and that made it possible for the importers to pay a lower tax rate since the value of goods that are not branded is much lower than that of products supported by a well-known trade mark.

Although this is originally a tax problem, the Mexican government made an attempt to attack it from both tax and IP perspectives.

Accordingly on January 27 2016 the Mexican Customs authorities published a new regulation known as Rule 3.1.17, which included an additional requirement for the importers of several products to provide certain information related to the trade marks that the imported goods will bear.

In addition, it has become a common practice of Mexican Customs brokers assisting the importing companies to request from their clients (the importing company) a letter granted by the trade mark owner (or its local representative) confirming authorisation to import and sell the goods using their trade mark.

This sort of letter is not required by the Mexican regulations nor Customs officers but by private Customs brokers to make sure the importing company is not infringing third parties' rights and that the goods imported are original products and not counterfeit.


Victor Ramirez

OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library
Commissioner Hamano Koichi shares his vision for the JPO and explains that IP offices must promote innovation that drives social change
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
The Supreme Court, which is hearing two IP cases this week, should limit the power of US courts to rule on foreign sales
Safety standards wouldn’t lose copyright protection when named in law, so long as they were accessible for free online
In-house tech sources say Amgen v Sanofi has the potential to stifle their prosecution and litigation strategies if SCOTUS’s decision is too broad
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Federal Circuit said tech firms can challenge the way the USPTO implemented Fintiv, but that won’t mean much for practitioners, say counsel
The England and Wales High Court handed down one of the most hotly anticipated FRAND rulings for some time