Spain: The utility model alternative

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: The utility model alternative

A utility model can be obtained in Spain for inventions relating to products, not methods, and for a term of 10 years.

The requirements to be met by a utility model in Spain are slightly different to the requirements to be met by a patent. Both rights require that the subject matter of the invention must be new and must involve an inventive step, but the meaning of inventive step is different for patents and utility models.

In the case of patents, an invention involves inventive step when it does not derive in an evident way from the state of the art, while in the case of utility models an invention involves inventive step when it does not derive in a very evident way from the state of the art.

This distinction between evident and very evident implies that if the invention incorporates a small improvement, not too inventive, it would be advisable to file a utility model application. This means that we can obtain stronger protection in Spain for a small improvement by filing a utility model, instead of filing a patent application.

Furthermore a utility model application does not require a search report nor an examination on patentability of the invention, unlike a patent application. This implies that there is no need to pay a search fee nor an examination fee. The invention is only examined on patentability requirements if an opposition is filed by a third party.

The new Spanish Patent Act that will come into force in 2017 includes some changes concerning enforceability of utility models. The main novelty with respect to the current law is that a search report must be requested to the Spanish Patent Office only if the owner of the utility model wishes to enforce his or her rights against a third party.

We might also say that the prosecution of a utility model application is quicker than the prosecution of a patent application. It only takes less than one month to be published and only five months to be granted if no opposition is filed. The prosecution is therefore quicker than the prosecution of a patent application which takes more than three years.

To sum up, we should say that if you need to protect a product invention in Spain in a quick, easy and cheap manner, we recommend you to proceed with a utility model application.

Castilla

Gabriel Castilla


PONS IPGlorieta Rubén Darío, 428010 – Madrid SpainTel: +34 917007600Fax: +34 913086103clientes@pons.eswww.ponsip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

VO, which has offices in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany, is the second European IP firm to secure external backing this week
The Bardehle Pagenberg attorneys-at-law discuss the firm’s Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 success, Unified Patent Court litigation strategy, and evolving European patent trends
A patent battle between two legal tech companies and a loss for Elon Musk’s xAI against OpenAI were also among the top talking points
With drug prices a hot topic in the US, courts are seemingly more reluctant to prevent the entry of generics to the market
Academic Eden Sarid joins us during Pride Month to discuss queer expression and IP law, Patagonia v Pattie Gonia, and how queer and AI-generated creations both pose novelty concerns
Patent attorney Michael Henson joins the firm to lead its freshly launched blockchain and digital assets practice
A dispute over mammogram technology, and a development in the case between GSK and Moderna were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect
Peter O’Sullivan, a professional services executive, says he is looking forward to helping Pearce IP become the leading life sciences firm in Australia and New Zealand
Matteo Di Lernia, advocate at LCA Studio Legale, unpicks the CJEU’s ruling in M.M. Ristorazione v Villa Ramazzini, including its impact on litigation strategies
Gift this article