Argentina: IP in the marital community
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: IP in the marital community

The New Argentine Civil and Commercial Code, in effect as of August 1 2015, includes, when addressing different issues, regulations referred to intellectual property.

Several sections referred to IP-related matters in the Argentine New Civil and Commercial Code – as explained in previous briefings – are among the regulations that govern agreements (franchise, leasing, etc).

In a different branch of the Law, there also exist rules related to intellectual property in the regulation of marital community.

From a general point of view, Section 463 states that upon failure to opt for a prenuptial agreement, the spouses shall, as from the execution of marriage, be subject to the marital community regime as established by the Code.

In this respect, and being of interest in our matter, Section 464, subsection "o" states that the separate property of a husband and wife is intellectual, artistic or industrial property, when the intellectual work has been published or interpreted for the first time, the artistic work has been concluded, or the invention, the trade mark or the industrial design have been patented or registered before the marriage commencement. The moral right over the intellectual work always belongs to the author.

Finally, Section 499 refers to the marital community distribution, establishing a preferential right in the assignment to one particular spouse, with respect to such goods covered by intellectual or industrial property, when said goods relate to their professional activity or agricultural, commercial or industrial establishment.

Daniel R Zuccherino


Obligado & CiaParaguay 610, 17th FloorC1057AAH, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaTel: +54 11 4114 1100Fax: +54 11 4311 5675admin@obligado.com.arwww.obligado.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Mary Till, a former legal advisor at the USPTO who has joined Finnegan this week, is looking forward to providing clients with a USPTO perspective
IP in-house counsel who receive lots of pitches from AI vendors explain how they review them – or why they ignore them
Anna Sosis discusses the importance of IP education and explains why, away from IP, she could see herself becoming a mindfulness teacher
Cross-border judicial collaboration and EU copyright were hot topics on the second day of the EUIPO’s 5th IP Case Law Conference
Nancy Linck, who is 82, explains why she found something new to excite her at Carmichael IP
On day one of the EUIPO’s Case Law Conference, delegates heard why single-letter trademarks are weak and received an update on the EU’s design law shakeup
High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
Gift this article