Argentina: IP in the marital community

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Argentina: IP in the marital community

The New Argentine Civil and Commercial Code, in effect as of August 1 2015, includes, when addressing different issues, regulations referred to intellectual property.

Several sections referred to IP-related matters in the Argentine New Civil and Commercial Code – as explained in previous briefings – are among the regulations that govern agreements (franchise, leasing, etc).

In a different branch of the Law, there also exist rules related to intellectual property in the regulation of marital community.

From a general point of view, Section 463 states that upon failure to opt for a prenuptial agreement, the spouses shall, as from the execution of marriage, be subject to the marital community regime as established by the Code.

In this respect, and being of interest in our matter, Section 464, subsection "o" states that the separate property of a husband and wife is intellectual, artistic or industrial property, when the intellectual work has been published or interpreted for the first time, the artistic work has been concluded, or the invention, the trade mark or the industrial design have been patented or registered before the marriage commencement. The moral right over the intellectual work always belongs to the author.

Finally, Section 499 refers to the marital community distribution, establishing a preferential right in the assignment to one particular spouse, with respect to such goods covered by intellectual or industrial property, when said goods relate to their professional activity or agricultural, commercial or industrial establishment.

Daniel R Zuccherino


Obligado & CiaParaguay 610, 17th FloorC1057AAH, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaTel: +54 11 4114 1100Fax: +54 11 4311 5675admin@obligado.com.arwww.obligado.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article