Argentina: IP in the marital community

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: IP in the marital community

The New Argentine Civil and Commercial Code, in effect as of August 1 2015, includes, when addressing different issues, regulations referred to intellectual property.

Several sections referred to IP-related matters in the Argentine New Civil and Commercial Code – as explained in previous briefings – are among the regulations that govern agreements (franchise, leasing, etc).

In a different branch of the Law, there also exist rules related to intellectual property in the regulation of marital community.

From a general point of view, Section 463 states that upon failure to opt for a prenuptial agreement, the spouses shall, as from the execution of marriage, be subject to the marital community regime as established by the Code.

In this respect, and being of interest in our matter, Section 464, subsection "o" states that the separate property of a husband and wife is intellectual, artistic or industrial property, when the intellectual work has been published or interpreted for the first time, the artistic work has been concluded, or the invention, the trade mark or the industrial design have been patented or registered before the marriage commencement. The moral right over the intellectual work always belongs to the author.

Finally, Section 499 refers to the marital community distribution, establishing a preferential right in the assignment to one particular spouse, with respect to such goods covered by intellectual or industrial property, when said goods relate to their professional activity or agricultural, commercial or industrial establishment.

Daniel R Zuccherino


Obligado & CiaParaguay 610, 17th FloorC1057AAH, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaTel: +54 11 4114 1100Fax: +54 11 4311 5675admin@obligado.com.arwww.obligado.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article