UK: Increasing the PACE at the EPO

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK: Increasing the PACE at the EPO

The results of the EPO's recently published Patent Filings Survey illustrate that the European patent is more popular than ever, with this upwards trend predicted to continue. A detailed study of the survey reveals that the strong growth in filings at the European Patent Office is driven by increased patent filing activity in both the UK and China, alongside a continued rise in other major territories.

Any increase in European patent filings is obviously associated with a concomitant increase in the workload of the EPO. As such, accelerating the prosecution of a patent application through the EPO is likely to become a more frequent client request.

In the case of Euro-PCT applications, accelerated examination under PACE may be requested at any time. However, for the request to be as effective as possible it should be made upon entry into the European phase, or together with any response to the WO-ISA, IPER or SISR required under Rule 161(1) EPC.

To further accelerate prosecution, an applicant may waive the right to a communication pursuant to Rule 161(1) or (2) and 162, pay any claims fees due and, where required, submit a response under Rule 161(1) upon entry into the European phase. Any request for accelerated examination at this time will encompass the formalities examination, the supplementary European search report and/or substantive examination as applicable.

It is important to note that accelerated examination of an application will cease if any request for an extension of time for response is made to the EPO. Additionally, accelerated examination may only be requested once per application, thus any re-entry into the accelerated examination procedure before the EPO is not possible.

Finally, accelerated examination will be suspended if any renewal fees due before the EPO are not paid before their initial due date. Here, any application may be returned to accelerated prosecution with the payment of the renewal fee within the six-month grace period.

Accelerated prosecution provides an excellent means of ensuring the timely prosecution of pending European patent applications. However, it is essential the intricacies of the system are fully understood to achieve the best results for attorneys and clients alike.

Chapman

Helga Chapman


Chapman + Co18 Staple GardensWinchester SO23 8SRUnited KingdomTel: +44 1962 600 500  info@chapmanip.com  www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Benoit Geurts and Coreena Brinck will help the firm ‘accelerate its innovation agenda’, according to its managing partner
News of a trademark row over Taylor Swift’s ‘The Life of a Showgirl’ and Nokia’s expansion of its IoT licensing programme were also among the top talking points
IP attorneys share how the Cox v Sony ruling impacts their counselling strategies, and if the case could influence how courts may assess liability for AI platforms
Gift this article