Mediation in practice

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mediation in practice

A formidable panel of trademark experts took the stage for Sunday’s mock mediation session. On one side were Miles J. Alexander of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton in the U.S. and Daniel R. Bereskin of Bereskin & Parr in Canada. Opposing them were Louis T. Pirkey of Pirkey Barber and Lori A. Ball of Molson Coors. Driving the parties towards an agreement was moderator Leslie J. Lott of Lott & Fischer in the U.S.

The lawyers were reenacting a real case concerning the Homeaway and Homesaway marks in a realistic portrayal of a mediation that featured opening statements, joint sessions between the parties, private caucuses and the occasional sarcastic comment (such as “They say it’s not extortion. We know better”).

The session was introduced by James M. Amend, who also provided a commentary on some of the action and decisions. He noted how ­moderator Lott “focused on the driving forces behind a potential settlement” by getting the parties to set out terms first, before deciding on a dollar figure. In the end, the moderator provided a suggested figure confidentially to each party, which they both accepted.

Lott emphasized that focusing on what is “fair” in a mediation may not always be helpful, and it is important to remind the parties of that: “Peace may be more important to the parties than fairness.” Following the mock mediation, the speakers revealed that the real case that inspired the session had been resolved in voluntary mediation to the satisfaction of both parties in 2007, and that both companies had gone on to be successful.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Firm says appointment of Nick McDonald will boost its expertise in cross-border disputes, including at the Unified Patent Court
Gift this article