IP office workshop launched

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IP office workshop launched

In a new initiative at this year’s Annual Meeting, INTA is hosting a series of panels for IP offices, all of which take place today. The workshop will provide representatives of many offices—both regional and national, big and small—with an opportunity to compare best practices, share challenges and learn from each other.

The day’s programming has been put together by representatives of the UK IP Office (UKIPO), the IP Office of Singapore and Chile’s INAPI. “National offices have long used the INTA Annual Meeting as an opportunity to meet each other informally, and we’re delighted that INTA has this year provided some space for a closed meeting,” Steve Rowan, Divisional Director Trade Marks and Designs at the UKIPO, told the INTA Daily News.

The discussions, which will consist of a series of panels each comprising a moderator and three speakers from different offices, will address issues such as productivity, efficiency, quality, outreach and enforcement.

“There are quite a lot of opportunities for work sharing in patents, such as patent prosecution highways, but not so much at present in trademarks,” said Maximiliano Santa Cruz Scantlebury, Director of INAPI. “But in Chile we have an open policy and are very active in regional and worldwide cooperation.” As well as cooperating with other offices in Latin America, INAPI has worked on projects with the Canadian and Australian offices.

One area for cooperation in electronic filing and management tools: INAPI now receives 80% of trademark applications online and Santa Cruz says he wants to extend this to renewals, so that they can be done in “three minutes rather than three months.”

Rowan pointed out that there is already a degree of cooperation between national offices in Europe, with some common IT systems and harmonization of some formality requirements. The UKIPO, like others, also hosts visits and exchanges with other offices: it recently welcomed representatives from 15 Caribbean countries.

While officials have an opportunity to discuss substantive issues at meetings such as WIPO’s Standing Committee on Trademarks, today is expected to provide an opportunity to liaise on more practical issues, from software tools to HR management to tips when joining the Madrid System. “We came up with a very long list of issues, so there will be plenty to talk about—and hopefully this will become an annual event,” said Rowan.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article