Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Preview: Monitoring online platforms

Online platforms provide the opportunity for just about anyone to sell a product or service, without the resources required for brick-and-mortar commerce. That provides sellers of counterfeit and contraband goods with the perfect hiding place: in plain sight, among countless others, and isolated from the in-person scrutiny of a potential buyer.

Estimates suggest that 60% of all counterfeit goods are sold online, and brand owners essentially have two courses of action available to them: “Follow the protocols of the IP protection policies that all of the platforms have, or pursue and confront counterfeiters and start legal actions,” according to Virginia Cervieri of Cervieri Monsuárez & Associates in Uruguay, who will moderate a panel, CT21, on online enforcement on Tuesday. Many brand owners choose “cooperation” with e-commerce platform providers over “confrontation,” Cervieri says.

Tuesday’s panel will feature speakers from Tommy Hilfiger, Adidas, Luxottica and Levi Strauss, who will present three cases demonstrating their coordination with popular platforms—Facebook, Alibaba and MercadoLibre. Each of these e-commerce platforms has policies to prohibit the sale of counterfeit goods and prevent IP infringement on their sites (as do most), but infringers can and do slip through. Once these counterfeit products are on the sites, “the brand owners, in my opinion, have all of the work,” Cervieri says.

“They have to monitor, notify the platforms and then wait for removal, which can take sometimes almost a week,” says Cervieri.

While the platforms do have policies in place, they are not proactive and place too much of the burden on brand owners, she adds. “The only other option available to brand owners is to confront individual infringers themselves and begin legal action. Neither option is efficient.”

The questions that will be addressed in the session, then, are: “Will the brand owners continue to cooperate, or will the platforms have to become more cooperative, and what are the common problems that brand owners are facing with these platforms?” says Cervieri.

CT21 Online Enforcement: Counterfeit Products, Contraband but Genuine Products, Parallel Imports is on Tuesday at 11:45

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library
Commissioner Hamano Koichi shares his vision for the JPO and explains that IP offices must promote innovation that drives social change
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
The Supreme Court, which is hearing two IP cases this week, should limit the power of US courts to rule on foreign sales
Safety standards wouldn’t lose copyright protection when named in law, so long as they were accessible for free online
In-house tech sources say Amgen v Sanofi has the potential to stifle their prosecution and litigation strategies if SCOTUS’s decision is too broad
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Federal Circuit said tech firms can challenge the way the USPTO implemented Fintiv, but that won’t mean much for practitioners, say counsel
The England and Wales High Court handed down one of the most hotly anticipated FRAND rulings for some time