Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Taiwan: Proving secondary meaning with a survey

According to Taiwan's trade mark examination practice, a three-dimensional mark in the form of a product packaging container is generally considered not inherently distinctive, and is registrable only upon proof of the secondary meaning acquired through long-term and extensive use. Without such evidence, the TIPO will refuse registration of the mark or require the applicant to disclaim the exclusive right to use the packaging container if there are distinctive word and/or device elements on the packaging container.

In practice, when examining evidence of use submitted for a three-dimensional mark, the TIPO takes the position that consumers will see the word and/or device elements on the packaging container, rather than the packaging container itself, as the identifier of the source of the product. Thus, even though the evidence submitted by the applicant could be voluminous, the TIPO may still deem such evidence not sufficient to prove the secondary meaning acquired by the three-dimensional mark.

The predecessor of EOS Products filed a trade mark application for a three-dimensional mark designated for use on cosmetics, lip balm, etc. The mark consists of the wording "eos" and a three-dimensional configuration of the packaging for the designated goods. The configuration is comprised of a spherical body with an indented portion on one side at the midpoint of the circumference. During prosecution, even though the applicant submitted evidence of use, the TIPO still rejected the application on the ground that the source identifier of the applicant's goods was the wording "eos" and the spherical packaging container was merely an ornamental design without having acquired secondary meaning.

After an unsuccessful appeal, EOS Products initiated administrative litigation before the IP Court. During litigation, in addition to the previously submitted evidence of use, EOS Products submitted reports on brand identity and brand awareness surveys launched in Taiwan. The surveys tested whether local consumers can recognise the spherical packaging, without the "eos" wording, as a source identifier of the relevant products, and the survey results showed that more than half of the interviewees recognised the spherical packaging as a source identifier.

The IP Court, holding that the survey reports were competent proof of acquired distinctiveness of the mark at issue, ruled in favor of EOS Products.

To increase the chances of getting a three-dimensional mark registered, the applicant may consider launching brand identify surveys in the local market in addition to gathering evidence of use.


Julia YM Hung

Saint Island International Patent & Law Offices7th Floor, No. 248, Section 3Nanking East RoadTaipei 105-45, Taiwan, ROCTel: +886 2 2775 1823Fax: +886 2 2731

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers wish the latest manual had more details on Federal Circuit cases and that training materials for design patent examiners were online
Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A technical effect must still be evident in the original patent filing, the EBoA said in its G2/21 decision today, March 23
Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change