Spain: Impact of EU trade mark reforms in Spain

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: Impact of EU trade mark reforms in Spain

On December 23 2015, the Official Journal of the European Union published the Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The aim of this Directive is to reach a further harmonisation of provisions of substantive and procedural laws relating to the trade mark systems at national and EU level.

The new EU Trade Mark Regulation adopted by the European Union Intellectual Property Office applies from March 23 2016.

Member states are bound to adapt their national laws to transpose this new Directive by January 14 2019, except for Article 45, concerning the procedure for revocation or declaration of invalidity, which will enter into force from January 15 2023.

As regards those amendments that represent substantive changes, as compared with the current Spanish regulations, three of them deserve special attention.

The first one concerns the new concept of a trade mark, where the requirement of graphic representation disappears. The requirement the new definition embraces is that signs must be represented in a manner that allows the competent authorities and the public to determine, clearly and precisely, the subject matter of the protection. Therefore, it will be required to provide for new appropriate ways of representation.

The second change has to do with the opposition procedure. Spanish trade mark law already provides for an administrative opposition procedure. Thus, the challenge lies in putting into practice a system embracing non-use of the prior sign as a defence.

Therefore, at the request of the applicant, the opposing party will have to demonstrate that the prior sign has been in use, within a five-year period preceding the filing date or priority date of the later trade mark. If the opponent fails to provide evidence of use, the opposition will be rejected, unless there are proper reasons for non-use.

The third amendment refers to providing for an administrative procedure for revocation or declaration of invalidity of a trade mark. At present, parties are compelled to appeal to the courts.

These reforms lead to the following conclusions.

First, the new concept of trade mark will facilitate the registration of non-traditional signs. Second, proving the genuine use of a prior sign will be inevitably to exercise the rights arising from its registration, as oppose to the present Spanish regulation. Finally, administrative procedures for revocation or declaration of invalidity will involve a significant change in the Spanish trade mark system to invalidate a trade mark where there is some ground for refusal.

Urrea

Carmen Urrea


PONS IPGlorieta Rubén Darío, 428010 – Madrid SpainTel: +34 917007600Fax: +34 913086103clientes@pons.eswww.ponsip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In an exclusive interview, Rouse CEO Luke Minford, Arnold & Siedsma managing partner Steve Duxbury, and Wrays executive chairman Gary Cox discuss plans to build the world’s first ‘truly integrated’ global IP services business
Benjamin Grzimek, partner at Casalonga’s new Düsseldorf office, believes the firm is well-placed to challenge German UPC dominance
A lot of the reporting around the Anthropic settlement misses something critical: it isn’t that relevant to AI training, argues Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
Justin Hill and Marie Jansson Heeks, part of an 18-strong team to have joined Crowell & Moring, explain why IP client advice must go beyond only being called upon for patent disclosure
To mark the EUIPO having processed five million EUTM and REUD applications, Managing IP speaks to the most prolific representatives to uncover how they stay at the top of their game
The merger marks Rouse’s second M&A deal within a month, and will provide access to Arnold & Siedsma’s UPC offering
Simon Tønners explains why IP provides the chance to work with some of the most passionate, risk-taking, and emotionally invested clients
The co-leaders of the firm’s new SEP practice group say the team will combine litigation and prosecution expertise to guide clients through cross-border challenges
Boasting four former Spruson & Ferguson leaders and with offices in Hong Kong and Singapore, the IP firm aims to provide fast, practical advice to clients
Partners at three law firms explain why trade secrets cases are rising, and how litigation is giving clients a market advantage
Gift this article