Mexico: Coverage of class headings

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Coverage of class headings

It has recently become common in Mexico to be more specific with the descriptions of products and/or services when filing a trade mark application, making it more unusual to apply for the class headings.

This practice of applying for the class heading has changed due to the fact that the classification criterion at the Mexican Trademark Office (TMO) has become stricter. For example, certain general indications such as "parts and fittings" are required to be specified. Likewise phrases similar to "all goods in Class X" are no longer accepted by the TMO.

It has been interpreted that the class headings only cover the goods or services specifically mentioned in the each of the class headings and that all the general indications of a particular class heading does not means that all the goods in the class are included in the requested protection.

Before, it was a common practice to apply for the class headings and obtain broadest protection of goods and services since it was easier and a tactic to avoid unnecessary official actions from the examiner requesting to specify products, because it was understood that the class headings covered all goods/services included in the class even though they were not specifically designated in the description.

Now, the practice is the contrary: a trade mark registered for the class heading is understood to cover the exact goods/services listed or any product or service that could be logically interpreted as falling under the literal meaning of the class heading.

In any event, the detailed alphabetical list of goods and services should be consulted to determine the precise classification of each product or service for which the mark is to be registered in Mexico and also in order to permit the TMO examiners to define or accept the extent of protection as described and to try to avoid unnecessary classification requirements.

sada

Camen Sada


OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01olivlaw@olivares.com.mxwww.olivares.com.mx

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Benoit Geurts and Coreena Brinck will help the firm ‘accelerate its innovation agenda’, according to its managing partner
News of a trademark row over Taylor Swift’s ‘The Life of a Showgirl’ and Nokia’s expansion of its IoT licensing programme were also among the top talking points
IP attorneys share how the Cox v Sony ruling impacts their counselling strategies, and if the case could influence how courts may assess liability for AI platforms
Gift this article