Mexico: Coverage of class headings

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Coverage of class headings

It has recently become common in Mexico to be more specific with the descriptions of products and/or services when filing a trade mark application, making it more unusual to apply for the class headings.

This practice of applying for the class heading has changed due to the fact that the classification criterion at the Mexican Trademark Office (TMO) has become stricter. For example, certain general indications such as "parts and fittings" are required to be specified. Likewise phrases similar to "all goods in Class X" are no longer accepted by the TMO.

It has been interpreted that the class headings only cover the goods or services specifically mentioned in the each of the class headings and that all the general indications of a particular class heading does not means that all the goods in the class are included in the requested protection.

Before, it was a common practice to apply for the class headings and obtain broadest protection of goods and services since it was easier and a tactic to avoid unnecessary official actions from the examiner requesting to specify products, because it was understood that the class headings covered all goods/services included in the class even though they were not specifically designated in the description.

Now, the practice is the contrary: a trade mark registered for the class heading is understood to cover the exact goods/services listed or any product or service that could be logically interpreted as falling under the literal meaning of the class heading.

In any event, the detailed alphabetical list of goods and services should be consulted to determine the precise classification of each product or service for which the mark is to be registered in Mexico and also in order to permit the TMO examiners to define or accept the extent of protection as described and to try to avoid unnecessary classification requirements.

sada

Camen Sada


OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01olivlaw@olivares.com.mxwww.olivares.com.mx

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

News of Dolby suing Snap over AV1 and HEVC patents and SCOTUS offering guidance on the liability of internet service providers were also among the top talking points
Arrival of Caitlin Heard will bolster the soon-to-be-created Ashurst Perkins Coie’s IP presence in the capital
AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Sharad Vadehra of Kan & Krishme discusses why older IP firms still have an edge over up-and-coming boutiques and how the firm is using AI to provide quick and cost-effective service
Lawyers at Appleyard Lees share how they picked apart a plant breeder’s infringement claims concerning the ‘Tango’ mandarin
A further decision on long-arm status, and a new hire for Pentarc in Germany from Taylor Wessing were also among top developments
The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Gift this article