Australia: Best mode fully enforceable

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Best mode fully enforceable

The patentee's obligation to fully describe their invention, including the best mode of implementation, has recently been found to be fully enforceable in Australia.

In Les Laboratories Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 27, the application dealt with a 'salt of perindopril' which had particular application in the treatment of hypertension. The actual invention appeared to be the discovery of the salt's suitability for use in treatment. The patentee seemed unconcerned how to make the salt, noting that "it has been prepared according to a classical method of salification of organic chemistry".

In practice the applicant had prepared three different classical methods of salification, but failed to disclose the actual techniques in the specification. The potential infringer successfully attacked the patent for failing to disclose the actual method of production of the salt as used by the patentee.

The Full Court found the applicant was under a strict obligation to disclose the actual best method that they were aware of. Even though the patentee may not have considered any of the methods to offer any advantages over other classical salification methods, the fact that they had not disclosed their actual method was fatal to the patent.

The effective take away from the case is that Australia will strictly enforce the patentee's need to describe the best mode of implementing the invention when filing an Australian complete application (or, more likely, on the PCT filing date). This is to be distinguished from other jurisdictions, notably the United States, where the best mode attack has recently been substantially eliminated.

Peter Treloar


Shelston IPLevel 21, 60 Margaret StreetSydney NSW 2000, AustraliaTel: +61 2 9777 1111Fax: +61 2 9241 4666email@shelstonip.comwww.shelstonip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article