Argentina: Intellectual property and leasing agreements
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: Intellectual property and leasing agreements

As explained in our April briefing, there are several sections referring to IP-related matters in the Argentine New Civil and Commercial Code that affect regulations that govern agreements.

A type of agreement that contains IP regulations is the leasing agreement.

In Section 1227, the new Code defines a leasing agreement as one in which the lessor agrees to transfer to the lessee the possession of a certain good for the use and enjoyment thereof against the payment of a royalty, and to confer on the latter the right to purchase the good.

The leasing constitutes a form of financing for the acquisition of goods that is widely used in business, as both parties obtain advantages: while the lessor is still the holder of the good given under leasing, with the consequent warranty for the investment of such good, the lessee satisfies his need immediately by disposing of said good for the use thereof.

Regarding what is strictly referred to as intellectual property, it is worth pointing out that Section 1228 establishes that the object of the agreement may be personal property or real estate, trade marks, patents or industrial models, and software, either owned by the lessor or which the lessor has the right to transfer by leasing.

In turn, Section 1234 states that in order to be enforceable against third parties, the agreement has to be filed with the corresponding registry depending on the nature of the thing that constitutes its object.

Those registrations shall be held by the National Institute of Industrial Property when the object of the leasing are trade marks, patents or industrial models, and by the National Registry of Pledge in the the case of software.

Daniel R Zuccherino


Obligado & CiaParaguay 610, 17th FloorC1057AAH, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaTel: +54 11 4114 1100Fax: +54 11 4311 5675admin@obligado.com.arwww.obligado.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Loes van den Winkel, attorney at Arnold & Siedsma, explains why clients' enthusiasm is contagious and why her job does not mean managing fashion models
Allen & Gledhill partner Jia Yi Toh shares her experience of representing the winning team in the first-ever case filed under Singapore’s new fast-track IP dispute resolution system
Gift this article