Argentina: Intellectual property and franchise agreements
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: Intellectual property and franchise agreements

Several sections related to IP-related matters in the Argentine New Civil and Commercial Code are among the regulations that govern agreements, and among those agreements it is the franchise agreement that has the largest amount of regulations of interest in terms of intellectual property.

In that respect, Section 1512 sets forth that the franchisor needs to be the exclusive holder of the rights in the trade marks, patents, commercial names and copyrights or needs to have the right to confer to the franchisee the right of use and transmission under the terms of these types of contracts.

The object of the franchise agreement is represented by the authorisation in favour of the franchisee to use a proven good-or-service-commercialisation system.

The license of the referred industrial or intellectual property rights is directly associated with the essential aim of the franchise agreement, which consists of cloning or copying the franchisor's company, including a complete outer identification of the franchise with the corporate image of such franchisor's company.

In addition to the immaterial or intangible, or even material, goods that constitute the object of the franchise agreement, there is also the provision of a body of technical knowledge and constant technical and commercial assistance – as established by the above mentioned section 1512 – which along with the above-mentioned elements makes it possible to commercialise goods or services by using the franchisor's proven system.

Daniel R Zuccherino


Obligado & CiaParaguay 610, 17th FloorC1057AAH, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaTel: +54 11 4114 1100Fax: +54 11 4311 5675admin@obligado.com.arwww.obligado.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
The UPC judges are wrong – restricting access to court documents, and making parties appoint a lawyer only to have a chance of seeing them, is madness
The group, which includes the Volkswagen, Seat and Audi brands, is now licensed to use SEPs owned by more than 60 patent owners
Gift this article