Argentina: Intellectual property and franchise agreements

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: Intellectual property and franchise agreements

Several sections related to IP-related matters in the Argentine New Civil and Commercial Code are among the regulations that govern agreements, and among those agreements it is the franchise agreement that has the largest amount of regulations of interest in terms of intellectual property.

In that respect, Section 1512 sets forth that the franchisor needs to be the exclusive holder of the rights in the trade marks, patents, commercial names and copyrights or needs to have the right to confer to the franchisee the right of use and transmission under the terms of these types of contracts.

The object of the franchise agreement is represented by the authorisation in favour of the franchisee to use a proven good-or-service-commercialisation system.

The license of the referred industrial or intellectual property rights is directly associated with the essential aim of the franchise agreement, which consists of cloning or copying the franchisor's company, including a complete outer identification of the franchise with the corporate image of such franchisor's company.

In addition to the immaterial or intangible, or even material, goods that constitute the object of the franchise agreement, there is also the provision of a body of technical knowledge and constant technical and commercial assistance – as established by the above mentioned section 1512 – which along with the above-mentioned elements makes it possible to commercialise goods or services by using the franchisor's proven system.

Daniel R Zuccherino


Obligado & CiaParaguay 610, 17th FloorC1057AAH, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaTel: +54 11 4114 1100Fax: +54 11 4311 5675admin@obligado.com.arwww.obligado.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Niall Trainor, managing attorney at Hasbro, says brands could boost their business with careful portfolio culling
A decision by the Paris Central Division will lead to more IP work for outside counsel, say sources
Courts are encouraged to deliver judgments within three months of a trial, but that deadline has been missed in several recent cases
Lawyers at Maiwald and Sterne Kessler analyse how patents with claims directed to medical treatments are handled in the US and in Europe
Michael DeVincenzo explains how he and his team convinced the Federal Circuit to find in favour of his client in a patent case against Salesforce
Funders and a litigator explain how litigation funding disclosure requirements could affect their business
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Discussions about whether to seek director reviews can come up frequently with clients, even though actual grant rates are rare
In the latest episode, we discuss why IP firms might be attractive to PE investors and bring you the latest news on submissions for next year’s IP STARS rankings
Back-to-back PE deals for IP firms in recent years show that IP firms are sitting on goldmines, so traditional partnerships should be open to change
Gift this article