Mexico: Which pharmaceutical-related claims are allowable?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Which pharmaceutical-related claims are allowable?

According to the Mexican Industrial Property Law (IPL) the following types of pharmaceutical-related claims are exceptions to patentability:

  • biological and genetic material as found in nature;

  • the human body and the living matter constituting it.

and the following shall not considered as inventions:

  • forms of presentation of information;

  • methods of surgical or therapeutic treatment or diagnosis applicable to the human body, and those relating to animals; and

  • the juxtaposition of known inventions or mixtures of known products, their variation of use, form, unless they actually are combined or merged to obtain an industrial result or a non-evident use to a person versed in the subject matter.

Furthermore, the Mexican practice also objects to product-by-process (in most cases) and omnibus claims.

According to IMPI's Patent Gazette, the following subject matters have been granted:

  • pharmaceutical product claims;

  • formulations and compositions claims;

  • pharmaceutical combination claims;

  • dosage claims;

  • salt claims;

  • polymorph claims; and

  • pharmaceutical use claims (Swiss-type claims and EPC2000 format).

Nevertheless, all the above types of claims usually face objections involving lack of novelty and inventive step. These objections are usually overcome by drafting the claim in terms of its technical features, and not based on its function or result and supporting it with the examples and proofs including in the description.

At present, dosage and polymorph claims are not well accepted based on the argument that they do not involve an inventive step and thus it is necessary to point out in a clear and concise manner in the description the unexpected effect of said dosage or polymorph, which must be duly supported by examples and comparative examples.

Herrera_Pedro

Pedro Herrera


OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01olivlaw@olivares.com.mxwww.olivares.com.mx

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article