Mexico: Which pharmaceutical-related claims are allowable?
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Which pharmaceutical-related claims are allowable?

According to the Mexican Industrial Property Law (IPL) the following types of pharmaceutical-related claims are exceptions to patentability:

  • biological and genetic material as found in nature;

  • the human body and the living matter constituting it.

and the following shall not considered as inventions:

  • forms of presentation of information;

  • methods of surgical or therapeutic treatment or diagnosis applicable to the human body, and those relating to animals; and

  • the juxtaposition of known inventions or mixtures of known products, their variation of use, form, unless they actually are combined or merged to obtain an industrial result or a non-evident use to a person versed in the subject matter.

Furthermore, the Mexican practice also objects to product-by-process (in most cases) and omnibus claims.

According to IMPI's Patent Gazette, the following subject matters have been granted:

  • pharmaceutical product claims;

  • formulations and compositions claims;

  • pharmaceutical combination claims;

  • dosage claims;

  • salt claims;

  • polymorph claims; and

  • pharmaceutical use claims (Swiss-type claims and EPC2000 format).

Nevertheless, all the above types of claims usually face objections involving lack of novelty and inventive step. These objections are usually overcome by drafting the claim in terms of its technical features, and not based on its function or result and supporting it with the examples and proofs including in the description.

At present, dosage and polymorph claims are not well accepted based on the argument that they do not involve an inventive step and thus it is necessary to point out in a clear and concise manner in the description the unexpected effect of said dosage or polymorph, which must be duly supported by examples and comparative examples.

Herrera_Pedro

Pedro Herrera


OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01olivlaw@olivares.com.mxwww.olivares.com.mx

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

View the Social Impact EMEA Awards 2024 shortlist and join us on September 12 at The Waldorf Hotel in London
James Tumbridge talks about advising the government on AI and why his day could start with the police and end with legal networking
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows that the IP ambitions of Asian full-service firms and a life sciences focus in the US have prompted lateral moves
Michelle Lue-Reid has joined the IP business as its chief transformation officer and will look to implement major change initiatives across member firms
Chad Landmon, who joins in Washington DC, hopes to expand the firm’s Hatch-Waxman practice
The FRAND rate is only 5 cents higher than the per-device rate determined at first instance in 2023
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Nearly four months after joining Crowell & Moring, Edward Taelman reflects on starting afresh, new clients, and firm culture
Firms discuss the ebb and flow of life sciences IP work and explain how they help professionals pivot between specialities
Mercedes-Benz, Dolby Laboratories, and Panasonic discuss the merits and drawbacks of the USPTO's terminal disclaimer proposal
Gift this article