Argentina: Image rights in the new Civil and Commercial Code

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: Image rights in the new Civil and Commercial Code

As we have explained in previous briefings, the new Argentine Civil and Commercial Code contains several sections that refer, both directly and indirectly, to intellectual property matters.

For example, the new code addresses in section 53 the subject of right to the image, and it does so in terms similar to those of section 31 of law 11,723 (Intellectual Property Law).

The right to the image has double content:

  • A positive aspect: the holder's right to authorise the publication and reproduction of his or her image, and from a more general perspective, to obtain an image-related economic profit.

  • A negative aspect: the right to prohibit third parties from obtaining and publishing one's own image.

The above-mentioned Section 53 of the new code is broader than Section 31, because while the latter refers exclusively to the portrait (although both doctrine and case-law had widened their scope when interpreting it), the new section now includes any registration: visual, auditory or audiovisual.

It arises from Section 53 that the holder's consent is required not only for the reproduction or publication of the image or the voice, but also for the capturing thereof.

Another significant difference compared with the previous text is that as the new regulation does not foresee the expression "it may not be commercialised", any capturing effected without the holder's consent, whether or not it is placed in commerce, will be illegal.

zuccherino.jpg

Daniel R Zuccherino


Obligado & CiaParaguay 610, 17th FloorC1057AAH, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaTel: +54 11 4114 1100Fax: +54 11 4311 5675admin@obligado.com.arwww.obligado.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article