Belgium: How to get a filing date? Language matters!

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Belgium: How to get a filing date? Language matters!

In Belgium, a patent is automatically granted, meaning the grant procedure does not involve a substantive examination of the application, with the provision that a search report has been issued.

In some cases, obtaining just a filing date can be strategically useful. The new Belgian patent law that entered into force on September 22 2014, is now in line with the Patent Law Treaty requirements (PLT) regarding the obtaining of a filing date in Belgium.

Upon filing, the Belgian Patent Office needs to receive at least the following three elements :

  • An explicit or implicit indication that the filed elements are intended to be a patent application (request form).

  • Indications that will allow the Office to establish the identity of the applicant and to get in touch with the applicant.

  • A part which seems to be a description at first sight.

According to further provisions, in order to obtain a filing date, the two first elements mentioned above should be prepared in the Belgian national language (Dutch, French or German) prescribed in accordance with the Belgian laws on the use of languages in administrative matters. Since Belgium is divided into four language areas, the applicable language needs to be checked by the applicant in order to fulfil this language requirement. In short, it means that a company based in the Flemish part of Belgium should file the first two elements in Dutch, a company based in the Walloon part of Belgium should use French and an entity which resides in the east of Belgium can use German or French. Finally, a company which resides in Brussels can choose between Dutch and French.

In contrast, the third element, including the part that seems to be a description, may be filed in any language. However, a translation of that part in the applicable Belgian national language has to be filed within a period of three months from the filing date.

Interestingly, to fulfil this third requirement a mere drawing is enough. This is an important advantage when the applicant does not have a written description available upon filing.

Note that when the application does not satisfy the aforementioned conditions, the Office will notify the applicant and ask him to regularise the application. However, the official filing date will be the date on which all the conditions are met. It is thereby recommended to make sure the request of filing is in the right language!

Since there are few elements you have to provide in order to obtain a filing date in Belgium, this process can happen in a very short time frame. However, a patent application which is prepared as completely and thoughtfully as time permits is strategically more useful, provided of course it is filed in the right language.

Vanhalle
Kourgias

Maja Vanhalle

Cathy Kourgias


Gevers & OresHolidaystraat, 5B-1831 Diegem - BrusselsBelgiumTel: +32 2 715 37 11Fax: +32 2 715 37 00www.gevers.eu

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
François Pochart, Grégoire Desrousseaux and Lionel Martin, long-standing figures in the firm’s patent litigation team, are set to help launch a Paris-based litigation offering
The Unitary Patent has passed 100,000 registrations, but new data raises the question of whether 30% uptake is a ceiling or a staging post for further growth, say Michael Nielsen and Darren Smyth of EIP and Andrew Samm at Patently
The new generation of in-house IP leaders want commercial judgment, accessibility and flexibility, with AI raising expectations around both fees and delivery
The firm launched a San Diego office earlier this month, but California investment and expansion is far from complete
The industry’s response to AI requires an unfamiliar ingredient as firms battle to shape their futures
The firm is looking beyond replacing recently departed talent, betting instead on senior leaders to strengthen and expand its patent litigation platform
Olga Partington, director in Sterne Kessler’s biotechnology and chemical practice group, shares why a patent's vulnerability peaks when it is young, rather than when it is most valuable, under the PTAB's new framework
Gift this article