Counterfeiting: an African perspective

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Counterfeiting: an African perspective

counterfeit-africa-final.jpg

Africa is a haven for counterfeiters. Yet things are changing. With the World Health Organisation estimating that 30% of the pharmaceutical market in Africa is counterfeit, African governments understand that counterfeiting creates public health, fiscal and societal problems. They know that they need to provide effective IP enforcement measures. Such measures now feature prominently in much of the new IP legislation in Africa. We will look at a few countries.

South Africa

The Counterfeit Goods Act, 1997 provides procedural mechanisms that assist IP owners. An IP owner can request the police and Customs authorities to search premises where it suspects that counterfeit goods are being stored or entering the country, and seize those goods so that they can be used in evidence in infringement proceedings. The legislation also creates various criminal offences.

Kenya

There is an Anti-Counterfeit Act of 2008, which provides for the seizure and detention of goods, and lays down harsh penalties for infringers. An Anti-Counterfeit Agency was formed after the introduction of the Act. In 2012 Kenya's High Court ruled that the Anti-Counterfeit Act was too broad, because it could interfere with the flow of generic medicines.

In a recent case involving copyright infringement a Kenyan court issued a search and seizure (Anton Piller) order to preserve evidence. The Kenyan authorities recently amalgamated a number of IP bodies including the Anti-Counterfeit Agency, to cut bureaucracy and improve co-operation in enforcement.

Ghana

On July 25 2014 the Trademarks (Amendment) Act came into force. Various forms of intentional trade mark infringement are now criminal offences. A court can order forfeiture and destruction of goods where criminal offences are being investigated.

Tanzania

In 2008 Tanzania passed the Merchandise Mark Regulations. There is provision for the appointment of inspectors, powers of detention and seizure of goods, and criminal prosecutions.

Angola

In 2014 the Copyright and Related Rights Law came into effect. This provides for the seizure of infringing goods while legal proceedings are pending, as well as for damages and the destruction of infringing material and equipment used in an infringement.

Morocco

On 18 December 2014 the new Industrial Property Law came into force. Customs authorities have the power to detain counterfeit goods that are in transit, and infringers can be required to pay the cost of warehousing and destroying counterfeit goods.

Uganda

Uganda's Anti-Counterfeit Goods Bill 2009 (not yet in force) clarifies that counterfeiting is limited to trade mark and copyright infringements – the earlier version had referred to patent infringements as well.

Zambia

The Intellectual Property Bill of 2011 (not yet in force) provides for a five-year prison term for counterfeiting, and for border seizures of counterfeit goods.

There may be some way to go, but things are moving in the right direction.

Wayne Meiring


Spoor & Fisher Jersey

Africa House, Castle Street

St Helier, Jersey JE4 9TW

Channel Islands

Tel: +44 1534 838000

Fax: +44 1534 838001

info@spoor.co.uk

www.spoor.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article