Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Best practices for PTAB success

Terry Stanek Rea of Crowell & Moring had some helpful tips for dealing with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board for preliminary responses, amendments, discovery, deposition evidence, objections to evidence and hearings

Speaking at the AIPLA Annual Meeting, Rea noted the high percentage of patent owners providing preliminary responses to petitions. “Best practice in most cases is to file a preliminary response because if you can stop the trial there, you can run back to the judge and say, ‘They couldn’t even get past the institution!’ It is gold plating the patent.”

The successful substantive arguments she has seen include claim constructions that permit petitioners to address fundamental gaps in the prior showing without requiring counter expert testimony.

Talking about depositions, Rea warned against advising your client not to answer. “If there is any disagreement between the parties you are supposed to call Ghostbusters!” she said, referring to the Board. “You are supposed to call PTAB right then and there at the deposition and say there has been a disagreement.”

In hearings, Rea warned that PTAB judges are extraordinarily prepared with probing questions. She said it is important to answer the questions asked, and to the required level of detail. Judges will keep asking the question until they get an answer, she said. “You are dealing with very sophisticated judges that probably know the record as well as you are supposed to.”

Presenters collectively need to be prepared on all issues, but there is no shame in a speaker deferring to a colleague. Rea said to be prepared to make multiple responses to the tough issues in your case, and be prepared for hypotheticals.

Rea said to consider using multiple presenters. “Nobody can know the record absolutely perfectly,” she said. “So have some of your colleagues with you and they can assist with answering some of the questions if they are outside your scope. I wouldn’t be embarrassed, the PTAB is there to pull out the best information possible.”

She added: “I think of it as being more like a Federal Circuit hearing than anything in a district court. Your job is to actually answer the question, give the judges what they want and hopefully persuade them that your side wins.”

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Allison M Hester, attorney at Moye White, outlines Mattel's litigation history and explains what trademark lessons brands can learn from the toy company
The Portuguese won a high-profile race to succeed Christian Archambeau as executive director in July
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP professional about their life and career
Van Anh Le, assistant professor in IP law at Durham University, assesses the US-Vietnam partnership and the potential implications for Vietnam's IP landscape
Civil society and industry representatives met in Geneva on Thursday, September 28 to discuss a potential expansion of the TRIPS waiver
Sources say the beta version of the USPTO’s new trademark search tool is a big improvement over the current system but that it isn’t perfect
Canadian counsel weigh in on the IP office’s decision to raise trademark filing fees in 2024 and how they’re preparing clients
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Shira Perlmutter, US Register of Copyrights, discussed the Copyright Office's role in forming generative AI policy during a House of Representatives hearing
The award marks one of the highest-ever damages received by a foreign company in a trademark infringement suit in China