Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The petitioners, patent owners and law firms topping the PTAB rankings

With filings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board suggesting another strong year, Managing IP has analysed the leading players at the PTAB and also included a PTAB category in our IP Stars rankings for the first time


The early indications from 2015 point towards nothing stopping the momentum behind the increasingly popular PTAB proceedings.

The USPTO’s latest figures reveal that 115 PTAB petitions were filed in January this year, 100 of which were IPRs. While the IPR figure was down on the 177 filed in December, it was up greatly on the 60 filed in January last year.

And February already looks set to blow last year’s figure out of the water. Some 60 IPR petitions had already been filed this month by the end of February 9, putting it ahead of the 54 IPRs filed in all of February 2014.

In addition, the Federal Circuit ultimately decided to implicitly endorse current PTAB practices at the end of January in its first opinion on an IPR appeal. Its in Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies decision affirmed the PTAB’s final determination, and found no error in the Board’s claim construction under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, the Board’s obviousness determination and the Board’s denial of Cuozzo’s motion to amend.

Observers concluded that the Federal Circuit had approved the basic framework for conducting PTAB proceedings, although a strongly worded dissent from Judge Pauline Newman did provide some pointers for future battle grounds over PTAB proceedings. The decision will provide certainty for PTAB practitioners.

In addition, the institution and invalidation rates – while down from the “death-squad” days of 2013 –are still high enough that the PTAB is by far the best shot for someone looking to get a patent invalidated.

Managing IP recently analysed which petitioners, patent owners and law firms were most active in 2014. Apple was the most-active challenger of patents, Zond was the most-targeted patent owner, and Fish & Richardson was the law firm involved in the most proceedings. You can see the full data of the most-active players at the PTAB in 2014 here (non-subscribers will have to take a trial to the website to view).

Aside from crunching the numbers to see which companies did the best in terms of volume, Managing IP also recently included PTAB firm rankings for the first time in our IP Stars guide to the leading IP firms and lawyers, which has just been published online.

You can access the 2015 IP Stars rankings here. To view the United States rankings, choose “United States” from the “Americas” drop down menu. You can then view the PTAB rankings by either scrolling down the page or choosing “PTAB litigation (USPTO)” from the “All practice areas” drop-down menu.

Don't forget: you can keep up with all of Managing IP's PTAB coverage on our dedicated topic page at 

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A technical effect must still be evident in the original patent filing, the EBoA said in its G2/21 decision today, March 23
Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library