KIPO looks to reduce examiner workload

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

KIPO looks to reduce examiner workload

kiki-and-popo-small.jpg

KIPO’s 2014 statistics show both a modest increase in patent and trade mark applications as well as reductions in pendency times

KIPO mascots

KIPO mascots Kiki and Popo. Kiki and Popo are "are human robots that symbolise cutting-edge science and technology illustrating KIPO as the highest intellectual property rights organisation in Korea"

KIPO received 210,000 applications in 2014, a 2.8% increase from the previous year. The office also received 150,000 trade mark applications, compared to 147,667 in 2013. In addition, it received 64,000 design applications, a 3.9% drop from 2013.

Overall, KIPO received 434,000 applications including invention patents, trade marks, designs, and utility models, a 0.9% increase from 2013.

For patent applications, average pendency time was 11 months in 2014, an improvement over the 13-month average pendency period in 2013. According to KIPO’s statistics, the pendency times for patent, trade mark and design applications as well as for trials before the IP Tribunal have been steadily dropping since 2010, with patent applications making the biggest gains. In 2010, the average pendency time for a patent application was over 18 months.

KIPO says its goal is to reduce average patent application pendency times to 10 months in 2015. It also aims to lower average pendency times for trade mark and design applications to five months from the 2014 average of slightly over six months for both.

In addition to reducing pendency times, KIPO says that it has been seeking to reduce the average workload per patent examiner. In 2014, the average KIPO examiner examined 207 patents, a number that is higher than those at the USPTO and EPO. Similarly, the average JPO examiner examined 193 applications per year in 2013.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article