KIPO looks to reduce examiner workload

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

KIPO looks to reduce examiner workload

kiki-and-popo-small.jpg

KIPO’s 2014 statistics show both a modest increase in patent and trade mark applications as well as reductions in pendency times

KIPO mascots

KIPO mascots Kiki and Popo. Kiki and Popo are "are human robots that symbolise cutting-edge science and technology illustrating KIPO as the highest intellectual property rights organisation in Korea"

KIPO received 210,000 applications in 2014, a 2.8% increase from the previous year. The office also received 150,000 trade mark applications, compared to 147,667 in 2013. In addition, it received 64,000 design applications, a 3.9% drop from 2013.

Overall, KIPO received 434,000 applications including invention patents, trade marks, designs, and utility models, a 0.9% increase from 2013.

For patent applications, average pendency time was 11 months in 2014, an improvement over the 13-month average pendency period in 2013. According to KIPO’s statistics, the pendency times for patent, trade mark and design applications as well as for trials before the IP Tribunal have been steadily dropping since 2010, with patent applications making the biggest gains. In 2010, the average pendency time for a patent application was over 18 months.

KIPO says its goal is to reduce average patent application pendency times to 10 months in 2015. It also aims to lower average pendency times for trade mark and design applications to five months from the 2014 average of slightly over six months for both.

In addition to reducing pendency times, KIPO says that it has been seeking to reduce the average workload per patent examiner. In 2014, the average KIPO examiner examined 207 patents, a number that is higher than those at the USPTO and EPO. Similarly, the average JPO examiner examined 193 applications per year in 2013.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
As competing firms come under common ownership, clients may care less about formal conflicts and more about how openly firms discuss them
Facing increased lateral movement and in-house competition, firms are investing in flexible billing hours and tailored career progression to improve associate retention
As the US reflects on 250 years of independence, patent lawyers say innovation is reshaping old hiring priorities, with firms seeking broader IP expertise over specialisation
Gift this article