Australia's inquiry into IP system reflects TPP concerns
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia's inquiry into IP system reflects TPP concerns

The government's Productivity Commission announced today that it is opening a public inquiry about the IP laws, including how these laws interact with the country's trade obligations

The Commission, an advisory body within the Treasury, will conduct the 12-month long inquiry into whether current IP laws "provide an appropriate balance between access to ideas and products, and encouraging innovation, investment and the production of creative works".

According to the announcement, the Commission will look into the following issues:

· Incentives for innovation and investment, including freedom to build on existing innovation

· Australia's international trade obligations

· The relative contribution of intellectual property to the Australian economy

· The economy-wide and distributional consequences of recommendations, including their impacts on trade and competition

· Ensuring the intellectual property system will be efficient and robust through time, in light of economic changes

· How proposed changes fit with, or may require changes to, other existing regulation or forms of assistance

· The relevant findings and recommendations of recently completed reviews.

Some of these issues are particularly timely given the controversy surrounding the Transpacific Partnership (TPP). The call for an assessment of the country's international trade obligations and the IP laws of trade partners makes sense in light of reports that the US and Australia are in disagreement over the length of data exclusivity periods for biologics. US law provides 12 years of exclusivity and is seeking the same, but Australia has said it would only go for five per its current law, given concerns about increased drug costs for its national healthcare system.

This inquiry on the IP system is one of several coming from the Australian government in the last year. In June, IP Australia (the patent office) published a report finding that there was little proof that the country's innovation patents, similar to utility model patents elsewhere, encouraged research and development or increased use of the IP system. And in March, the Competition Policy Review finalised its report on the country's competition laws, which included an analysis of the interplay between competition law and intellectual property. It recommended several things, including the repeal of Section 51(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, which provides limited exemptions for the exercise of IP rights and is sometimes targeted as an unnecessary hindrance to licensing. The review also recommended relaxing many of the restrictions to parallel importation, citing the high prices Australians pay for largely identical goods in comparison to consumers elsewhere, even when the goods are digital.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
The UPC judges are wrong – restricting access to court documents, and making parties appoint a lawyer only to have a chance of seeing them, is madness
The group, which includes the Volkswagen, Seat and Audi brands, is now licensed to use SEPs owned by more than 60 patent owners
Gift this article