Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Three views from in-house counsel on managing innovation


Diverse perspectives on the challenges of managing innovation in an increasingly politicised climate were provided by in-house counsel from 3M, Canon and Embraer at a lunchtime discussion at the AIPPI Congress

AIPPI lunch panel

Dean Harts of 3M said that his company recently received its 100,000th patent, while Kenichi Nagasawa said Canon had some 860 people working in IP worldwide. By contrast, said Wander Stange Menchik, Embraer has only been dealing with IP since 2006 and has an in-house team of just four people.

“Our competitors are much larger and have a stronger IP tradition. We’re still learning,” he said, speaking in Portuguese. He said his priorities are to ensure that IP assets are protected appropriately, to get the highest value out of the assets while also checking the company is not infringing others’ rights, and to structure the assets in the best possible way – something that is becoming more of a challenge: “The fiscal incentive law in Brazil is being reviewed and that could be a major obstacle if you invest in Brazil.”

AIPPI Embraer

On the positive side, there are few competitors and not much litigation in the aviation industry. But Embraer faces challenges arising from open innovation and cooperation: the company has more than 200 contracts with partners all over the world, including with universities and research institutes. Managing the IP rights and open innovation in that context can present difficulties.

Nagasawa faces somewhat different problems, which include the exponential growth in patents; the threat from patent assertion entities; 3D printing enabling manufacture at home; and what he called the “IP crossover” of different rights. He traced the evolution of an industry such as cameras from mechanical to electronic to IT-based technology, with the latter bringing additional features such as WiFi and GPS. Progression to each stage is accompanied by “a great increase in the number of patents embedded in a single product,” said Nagasawa.

Harts said that 3M is active in 200 countries, and two-thirds of its sales are outside the US; he compared his experience of patent and trade secrets disputes in Germany, Japan, the US and Korea. “The US is the most expensive jurisdiction for patent enforcement – but also the most expensive for defendants,” he commented.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Civil society and industry representatives met in Geneva on Thursday, September 28 to discuss a potential expansion of the TRIPS waiver
Sources say the beta version of the USPTO’s new trademark search tool is a big improvement over the current system but that it isn’t perfect
Canadian counsel weigh in on the IP office’s decision to raise trademark filing fees in 2024 and how they’re preparing clients
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Shira Perlmutter, US Register of Copyrights, discussed the Copyright Office's role in forming generative AI policy during a House of Representatives hearing
The award marks one of the highest-ever damages received by a foreign company in a trademark infringement suit in China
Two orders denying public access to documents have reignited a debate over a lack of transparency at the new court
Rouse’s new chief of operations and the firm’s CEO tell Managing IP why they think private equity backing will help it conquer Europe
Brian Landry, partner at Saul Ewing, reveals how applicants can prosecute patent applications in the wake of the Federal Circuit's In re Cellect ruling
Ronelle Geldenhuys of Australia’s Foundry IP considers the implications complex computer technologies such as AI have on decision-making