SIPO and EPO highlight IP cooperation
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

SIPO and EPO highlight IP cooperation

Officials from SIPO and EPO met in Lyon, France earlier this month to commemorate 30 years of cooperation and also to discuss further collaboration

The conference celebrated the 30th anniversary of bilateral cooperation between SIPO and the EPO and attracted over 140 Chinese and European experts from industry, government and academia.

"The close cooperation between the patent offices of Europe and China has been instrumental in developing a modern and efficient intellectual property system in China, which greatly benefits innovating businesses in both regions," said EPO President Benoît Battistelli in a press release.

Technology boom

Intellectual property in China is developing at a fast pace. Filings from Chinese companies at the EPO increased tenfold over the past decade and growth continues to be strong, Battistelli told China Daily. Following the US, Japan, and Germany, China is the fourth largest overseas filer to the EPO, with approximately 26,000 patent applications in 2014.

For Chinese companies filing at the EPO, the busiest areas were digital communications, computer technology and telecommunications. In digital communications, Chinese accounted for approximately one third of total filings worldwide. Meanwhile, filings from EU member states mainly focused on electrical machinery, apparatus, energy, medical technology, and transport areas. 

Telecommunication giants Huawei and ZTE are among the top 10 filers in Europe, with 1,600 and 476 patent applications respectively. Most of the other standout Chinese filers also come from the technology sector, including BOE Technology, China Academy of Telecommunications Technology, Baidu, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Xiaomi.

The result fully reflects that technology is a major driving force to China’s economy development and China has taken great efforts to encourage domestic innovation, Battistelli told China Daily.

Promote innovation – a global issue

China is seeking to transition to an innovation-based economy from one focused on manufacturing. As the legitimate tool to secure one’s innovation achievement, intellectual property is a crucial role in the shift.

The importance of IP is gaining serious attention by China government in recent years. Lately, China took a great leap forward in IP development by opening three specialised IP courts in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, which is regarded as a boon for multinationals.

Nevertheless, SIPO Commissioner Shen Changyu noted the importance of promoting and protecting innovation in a global scope. “The SIPO and the EPO will engage in deeper and more extensive co-operation to jointly promote innovation,” he said in a press release. “I am convinced that this will make an even greater contribution to the development of economies, technologies and cultures in China and Europe. It will also strengthen the development of global intellectual property and bring more benefits to innovators worldwide."

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Munich Regional Court ruled that Lenovo was an unwilling licensee and had engaged in ‘holdout’ tactics
Technological innovation should play a critical role in advancing sustainable practices, argues Justin Delfino, global head of IP and R&D at Evalueserve
Ewan Grist of Bird & Bird, who acted for Lidl in its trademark victory against Tesco, reveals some of the lessons brand owners can take from the judgment
Dolby’s lawsuit at the Delhi High Court follows a record win by Ericsson earlier this year against the same defendant
Tee Tan, chief information officer at the owner of several IP firms, says to avoid tech just for the sake of it and explains how his company builds in-house tools
Regardless of whether the FTC’s ban on non-competes goes into effect, businesses should stop relying on these agreements
Mary Till, a former legal advisor at the USPTO who has joined Finnegan this week, is looking forward to providing clients with a USPTO perspective
IP in-house counsel who receive lots of pitches from AI vendors explain how they review them – or why they ignore them
Anna Sosis discusses the importance of IP education and explains why, away from IP, she could see herself becoming a mindfulness teacher
Gift this article