US: Trade marks: Design marks: comparing and tacking
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US: Trade marks: Design marks: comparing and tacking

In the case Jack Wolfskin Ausrustung Fur Draussen GmbH & Co KGAA v New Millennium Sports, SLU, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an instructive decision overturning a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) finding of a likelihood of confusion between two design marks.

Jack Wolfskin had filed a trade mark application for a design mark consisting of an angled paw print. Newv Millennium opposed the application based on a claim of a likelihood of confusion with its own registered mark consisting of the stylized word "Kelme" in conjunction with a paw print mark. In response, Jack Wolfskin filed a counterclaim for cancellation of New Millennium's trade mark registration alleging that its design mark had been abandoned. The TTAB rejected the counterclaim and sustained the opposition, after which Jack Wolfskin took appeal to the Federal Circuit.

The first issue for the Court to consider was whether New Millennium had abandoned its registered design mark. Jack Wolfskin's claim of abandonment was based on the fact that New Millennium had ceased using the registered version of its design mark and had switched to a new, modified version of that mark. The Court held that when a trade mark owner transitions to a modified version of its registered design mark, it may avoid abandonment of the original mark and retain the benefits of its use of the earlier format only if the modified version "creates the same, continuous commercial impression" as the original. In the context of a priority dispute, the Court noted that if the old form of the design mark and the new form are "legal equivalents", the legal attack will fail. Applying this standard, the Court determined that the minor adjustments made to the font of New Millennium's design mark were not sufficient to warrant a finding that the marks created a different commercial impression. Accordingly, the Court agreed with the TTAB's finding that the registered design mark was not abandoned.

Having determined that New Millennium did not abandon its mark, theCourt next turned to reviewing the TTAB's finding of a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue. The TTAB had taken the position that the marks were confusingly similar even though New Millennium's mark contained the word "Kelme", reaching a broad conclusion that "companies that use marks consisting of a word plus a logo often display their logos alone, unaccompanied by the literal portions of their trademarks". The Court held that the TTAB's finding "essentially disregarded the verbal portion of New Millennium's mark" and did not consider the marks as a whole, an issue exacerbated by the wealth of evidence of third-party design marks comprised of paw prints submitted by Jack Wolfskin. While the TTAB could place greater emphasis on a design element under certain circumstances, the Court indicated that a rational reason for doing so was required, something that the TTAB did not provide.

This decision is instructive in that it provides guidance on the issue of tacking (namely, the ability to rely on an earlier form of a design mark when switching to a modified version) and on the factors considered when comparing two design marks for purposes of a likelihood of confusion analysis.

Ash_Karen

Danow_Bret

Karen Artz Ash

Bret J Danow


Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 575 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10022-2585United StatesTel: +1 212 940 8554Fax: +1 212 940 8671karen.ash@kattenlaw.comwww.kattenlaw.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Firms with a broad geographic reach are more likely to win work, especially from global companies with high turnovers, according to survey data of nearly 29,000 corporate counsel
IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals its latest rankings for trademark work today, including which firms are on the up
The 2024 firm rankings for trademark disputes and protection work are now available on ipstars.com
Highlights from Sunday included judicial insight from across the globe and a keynote address from Martin Luther King Jr’s daughter
Managing IP’s senior reporter Rani Mehta interviewed attendees at the INTA Annual Meeting in Atlanta about how they made the most out of their first day
A team of lawyers who joined Norton Rose Fulbright from Polsinelli say they were drawn to the firm's global platform
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers say a ruling concerning liability for trademark infringement could give company directors an easy way out and create litigation uncertainty
The LMG Life Sciences Awards announces the winners for the 5th annual awards
Some US lawyers have strengthened their connections with European firms as they help clients determine whether the UPC will become a 'centre of gravity'
Gift this article