Mexico: Compulsory licences and non-working

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Compulsory licences and non-working

In recent times we became aware of some requests for advice as to whether a statement of excuse for the non-working of a patented invention in Mexico should be filed with the Patent Office (IMPI).

It is true that the Mexican IP Law establishes that in the case of patented inventions, after three years from the date of grant of the patent, or four years of the filing of the application, whichever occurs later, any person may request IMPI to grant a compulsory licence to exploit the invention, when the invention is not worked in Mexico, unless there are justified reasons.

Notwithstanding this, there is no express obligation or a requirement to file evidence of working the patent or proofs of arguments related to the excuses for non-working the claimed invention to keep the patent/application alive or enforceable. In this regard, a recommendation to provide a statement or periodically file proofs of working, stating that they would prevent the filing or grant of a compulsory licence is completely unsupported.

According to the law, if a third party files an application for a compulsory licence, the title holder would have one year from the date IMPI informs about the request for compulsory licence to cure the non-exploitation of the invention and start working the patent in Mexico, either by exporting the patented product or using it in our country directly or through a licence recorded before IMPI. Therefore, the risk of a compulsory licence may not be actually reduced by filing a statement of working the patent.

In the case of a petition for a compulsory licence, the applicant also has the obligation to provide evidence showing technical and economic capacity for work the patent in Mexico. Furthermore, the IP Law establishes that after giving the opportunity to cure the non-exploitation there should be a hearing with the parties in which IMPI will decide on the grant of a compulsory licence, and if IMPI decides to grant it, it will set forth its duration, conditions, field of application and amount of royalties which should be fair and reasonable.

In Mexico the IP law does not define nor provide examples or parameters for justified excuse for not working a patent, nor how it would be proved or argued, therefore any kind of evidence allowed by the local regulations should be accepted by IMPI to sustain the justified excuse for not working the patent as an exception for the potential compulsory licence proceeding and eventually analysed by this authority on a case-by-case basis.

We have not been aware that a compulsory licence has been granted in recent years in Mexico; however if it occurs it would be subject to further and detailed study.

Alejandro Torres


OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01olivlaw@olivares.com.mxwww.olivares.com.mx

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP and commercial lawyers help ITV Studios acquire majority stake in Spanish production company Plano a Plano
The newly merged firm, formally announced on August 4, will have a combined revenue of around $3 billion and 40 IP partners
Managing IP will help mark IP Inclusive’s 10th anniversary by co-hosting a new podcast series covering diversity, equity, and inclusion within the IP profession
Tim Gilman, who joined Kasowitz alongside three other partners, says he is excited to be part of the firm’s ‘elite’ litigation team
A backlash against a White House video promoting deportation and Casalonga opening a new office in Düsseldorf were also among the top talking points
The firm has brought on board two counsel and an associate to complement two previously revealed partner hires
Bradford Newman, who has joined the firm’s new Silicon Valley office as head of complex technology disputes, discusses plans to build the practice group and attract local talent
Managing IP summarises the highlights from the IP STARS rankings for copyright and IP transactions work, the final firm rankings release of the year
Developments included the first judgment from the Nordic Baltic division, an injunction covering the UK, and a new code of conduct
Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Gift this article