How China is changing

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How China is changing

Ten years ago, when I was Asia editor for Managing IP in Hong Kong, discussions about IP in China focused almost entirely on counterfeiting: the scale of it, how to stop it and whether the country would develop a culture of indigenous innovation

There are still plenty of fakes of course, but the debate has moved on. Foreign companies have become better at understanding the rules and procedures for protecting their rights in China and many are focusing their attention on responding to the rise of the country’s home-grown - but expansionary – businesses.

diana-sternfeld.jpg

Another change has been improvements in China’s judicial system. At last week’s Women's Leadership Forum in London, Rouse’s Diana Sternfeld (right) said that her firm has litigated more than 1,000 IP cases in the country.

What has changed over time, she explained, is that China’s courts are now trying much harder to understand cases. She recounted how one judge had accompanied a raid to see how the defendants operated their counterfeiting business so as to understand the case better.

But as confidence in the courts is growing, so is demand for their services. IP disputes involving a foreign party make up a very small proportion of cases brought before Chinese judges: thousands more involve Chinese rivals.

That confidence has a downside: with courts so busy, many judges will look for opportunities to reduce their backlog and reject cases on procedural irregularities that seem trivial – and infuriating – to foreign IP owners. GE’s Catriona Hammer, for example, recalled one notary refusing to notarize a document prepared by a colleague in Sweden because it had been signed using a ballpoint pen rather than a fountain pen.

While it may not come as much comfort to IP litigants perplexed by China’s procedural red tape, the practical constraints they face may, in part, reflect a changing judicial system in which parties have increasing confidence.

For more on litigation in China, see Peter Leung's interview with Judge Chen Jinchuan, vice president of the new Beijing IP Court, in our latest issue (subscription or free trial required).

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A settlement between Philips and Transsion and a loss for AstraZeneca in the UK were also among the top talking points
Working with Harvey and Microsoft, the firm has been at the forefront of developing AI tools for its lawyers, and is now exploring new projects and business models
The Emotional Perception AI case, which centres on the patentability of an artificial neural network, will be heard next week
Developments included a court order related to InterDigital’s anti-anti-suit injunction against Disney, and clarification on recoverable costs
Partners at Foley Hoag examine how recent CJEU jurisprudence may serve as a catalyst for recalibrating US judicial reluctance to entertain foreign patent claims
International law firms have high hopes for their IP practices in Saudi Arabia, with many opening offices, but recruiting and retaining talent in the Kingdom presents unique challenges
Patrick Ogola joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss helping African entrepreneurs on the global stage, and explains why young lawyers should speak up
Heli Pihlajamaa, the EPO’s principal director for patent law and procedures, joins us to take stock of the unitary patent following its second anniversary
Kelly Thompson, chair of South African firm Adams & Adams, discusses self-belief, self-doubt, and the importance of saying yes
The renowned food brands were represented by a host of lawyers, including members of the firms’ IP teams
Gift this article