Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

PTAB allows Celgene to file for sanctions against Coalition for Affordable Drugs

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has authorised Celgene to file motions for sanctions in response to four inter partes review petitions filed by the Coalition for Affordable Drugs, the entity Kyle Bass and Erich Spangenberg are using to challenge pharmaceutical patents


Celgene requested authorisation to move for dismissal of the petitions as a sanction for abuse of process by petitioner or its real parties-in-interest.

In its rare order granting authorisation to file a motion for sanctions on June 9, the Board said the motion shall be filed on the same day as the preliminary response, if the patent owner elects to file a preliminary response. If the patent owner waives filing of a preliminary response, the motion for sanctions shall be filed no later than the due date for filing the preliminary response in each proceeding. The petitioner will have 10 business days to respond and the patent owner then has five days to file a reply.

The four IPRs were filed on April 23. Patent owners are given three months to file a preliminary response after the filing of a petition, meaning Celgene has until July 22 to file the motion for sanctions.

The Board said: “Our decision was based on a determination that briefing will facilitate development of a complete record and, thereby, will promote the just resolution of the issues raised by patent owner. We emphasised that our grant of authorisation to file a motion for sanctions is not a decision on the merits of patent owner’s allegation of abuse of process.”

The IPRs are four of 16 petitions the Coalition for Affordable Drugs has filed since February.

Bass, who managed hedge fund Hayman Capital, has attracted a lot of attention with his filings, which have prompted accusations that he is merely trying to short sell stock. It is not clear whether the USPTO can intervene to block the petitions. Anyone has standing to file IPRs, but the USPTO can prescribe sanctions for “improper use of the proceeding”.

For an in-depth analysis of The Coalition for Affordable Drugs’ IPR petitions, their chance of success and an interview with Bass, read our "The fine line between abuse and fair use at the PTAB" feature here (subscribers and triallists only).

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A technical effect must still be evident in the original patent filing, the EBoA said in its G2/21 decision today, March 23
Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library