Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy to join Unitary Patent – minister


Italian State Secretary for European Affairs Sandro Gozi confirmed that Italy will join the Unitary Patent during a public session of the EU Competitiveness Council in Brussels


Gozi (below left) intervened during a discussion on the EU trade mark reform package today, saying he had to leave the meeting shortly.

He said (English translation): “The Italian government has decided to agree to enhanced cooperation on the Unitary Patent. We have also started a procedure to amend the court procedure and we hope that this will move forward very fast.”

“We felt it was necessary to do this because the conditions were ripe. This has no impact on the language discrimination point. We still think this is something which is a dividing factor rather than a unifying factor and the Unitary Patent shouldn’t be seen as a precedent on this linguistic matter.”

Gozi's speech starts at about 2 hours 41 minutes into the video recording of the meeting. He gave more details on Italy’s position in a video interview after leaving the meeting (in Italian).

Sandro Gozi

Italy was one of two countries along with Spain that did not take part in the enhanced cooperation that led to the Regulations on the Unitary Patent. Both countries had concerns about the English/French/German language regime.

Despite this, Italy had signed the UPC Agreement and planned to host a local division of the Court in Milan.

However, its opposition had weakened in recent years and there were strong rumours that it would sign up to the Unitary Patent after the CJEU rejected Spain’s challenge earlier this month.

Spain remains outside the system, and Poland and Croatia are unlikely to take part at least at the beginning.

Trade mark package

Also during the meeting, UK Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and SKills Baroness Neville-Rolfe (below right) said the UK was not able to support the recently agreed trade mark package in its entirety since “it enables future revenue surpluses at OHIM to be transferred to the general budget and this is a red line for the UK. As IP minister, I would prefer any surpluses to be recycled to support innovation, enforcement etc.”

Lucy Neville-Rolfe

Germany’s State Secretary, Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection Gerd Billen added: “As to how the question of how national institutions will cooperate, I think we have come up with a valid proposal on this.”

EU Commissioner Elżbieta Bieńkowska welcomed the agreement, saying it would help to more effectively tackle counterfeit products. “The Commission did have concerns about the financial aspects and governance of OHIM, and these concerns remain. We have issued a statement and will still discuss it. In the view of true added value for users, the Commission has decided to support it even with those concerns,” she said.

More details about the trade mark reform package are expected to be revealed next month.

Also on the Council’s agenda today was the Digital Single Market, which was discussed off-camera.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Safety standards wouldn’t lose copyright protection when named in law, so long as they were accessible for free online
In-house tech sources say Amgen v Sanofi has the potential to stifle their prosecution and litigation strategies if SCOTUS’s decision is too broad
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Federal Circuit said tech firms can challenge the way the USPTO implemented Fintiv, but that won’t mean much for practitioners, say counsel
The England and Wales High Court handed down one of the most hotly anticipated FRAND rulings for some time
Funders discuss different IP portfolio funding options and how they decide whether to offer preferential terms and pricing
The issue of the Unified Patent Court’s third central division needs resolving before IP owners can fully embrace Europe’s new era
Foreign firms and lawyers, including IP practitioners, can now practise in India after years of talk and no action
Most Indian counsel won’t immediately look beyond the Delhi High Court for IP cases, but new forums could potentially change their minds
Milan may only fulfil its UPC dream at a price, with a decision from negotiations between France and Germany expected shortly