FBI on anti-counterfeiting: “collaborate early and often with law enforcement”

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FBI on anti-counterfeiting: “collaborate early and often with law enforcement”

FBI thumb

Anti-counterfeiting specialists from the FBI and Interpol reveal the challenges they face; from data privacy rules to public perception

FBI

Representatives from the FBI and Interpol discussed their efforts around anti-counterfeiting at INTA’s Annual Meeting in Boston at the end of May.

Liam Gimon, criminal intelligence officer at Interpol in Singapore, said that the biggest barrier to effective anti-counterfeiting is data protection. From laws like the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe to Interpol’s own data privacy policies, sharing industry information with police is tough, Gimon said.

Yet communication and data sharing is necessary for effectiveness. “A lot of times the country of origin has no idea counterfeit products are being made there until we tell them, so communication is vital,” Gimon explained.

Interference and corruption

Cross-border communication and cooperation results in more detailed and successful investigations, but data sharing is currently inhibited on both a cultural and legal level. Interpol is in the process of revamping its data sharing policies to become more open.

There can be political interference as well. For example, China supports capital punishment for counterfeiting in the pharmaceutical space. In response, UK authorities resolved not to share data with China.

Perhaps the most important issue for anti-counterfeiting is simply a lack of awareness. Gimon explained: “Industry is motivated, but governments don’t give it a lot of attention, and between countries, there’s a lot of corruption in this space.”

Interpol’s strategy takes a three-pronged approach:

-       awareness, specifically with judges and police officers, emphasising that counterfeiting is a crime;

-       capacity, implementing the latest technology;

-       and operations, which includes “the fun stuff, like kicking down doors,” Gimon said.

The international organisation runs various global programmes to fight counterfeits, including Operations Opson and Pangea, which monitor counterfeit foods and pharmaceuticals, respectively. It also carries out regional initiatives, such as Operation Rainfall, which aims to protect medical devices in Southeast Asia, and Operation Hawk, about to be launched for the luxury goods industry.

Barriers to entry


Steven Shapiro, IP unit chief at the FBI, said that his overall strategy is “to create so many barriers to entry that it’s not worth it to counterfeit”. Like Gimon, Shapiro emphasised the importance of education, as it could be the key to behaviour change in the market.

“Some consumers are just going to buy counterfeits,” Shapiro said. “Others have no idea that what they’re buying is counterfeit, and would change their habits if they did. We’ve got to change the value proposition, and emphasise that it's something that could be harmful to you as a consumer.”

Thankfully, brands play an important role. “Unlike most other forms of crime,” explained Shapiro, “IP cases are different because industry is involved, and it helps us get to an indictment point a lot faster.”

He encouraged brands to approach him with questions, and recommended that they “collaborate early and often with law enforcement” when it comes to anti-counterfeiting efforts.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Howard Hogan, IP partner at Gibson Dunn, says AI deepfakes are driving lawyers to rethink how IP protects creativity and innovation
Vivien Chan joins us for our ‘Women in IP’ series to discuss gender bias in the legal profession and why the business model followed by law firms leaves little room for women leaders
Partner Jeremy Hertzog explains how his team worked through a huge amount of disclosure from Adidas and what victory means for the firm
Evarist Kameja and Hadija Juma at Bowmans explain why a new law in Tanzania marks a significant shift in IP enforcement
In the wake of controversy surrounding Banksy’s recent London mural, AJ Park’s Thomas Huthwaite and Eloise Calder delve into the challenges street artists face in protecting their works and rights
Alex Levkin, founder of IPNote, discusses reshaping the filing industry through legal tech, and why practitioners’ advice should stretch beyond immediate legal needs
Cohausz & Florack, together with Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben, has taken action against Amazon on behalf of three VIA LA licensors
In the fourth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss unconscious bias in the IP workplace and how to address it
Greg Munt, who has moved from Griffith Hack to James & Wells after four decades, hails his new firm’s approach to client service
Practitioners warn that closing the Denver regional office could trigger a domino effect, threatening local innovation and access to IP resources
Gift this article