Brazil: Renowned marks gain increasing recognition

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Renowned marks gain increasing recognition

Sponsored by

daniel-400px.png

Brazilian IP law believes that renowned marks deserve special protection in all fields of activity. Differently from well-known marks, which are protected within their field of activity and regardless of the existence of a local registration, renowned marks must be registered and then go through a specific proceeding at the BPTO for a declaration of high renown which will be valid for 10 years.

High renown requests were positively affected by the recent BPTO trend to expedite trademark examination bearing in mind the recent accession to the Madrid Protocol. Not only has the BPTO's examination productivity increased, but examiners have also become less stringent about the necessary requirements for marks to be deemed highly renowned.

As a result, there are currently 114 trademarks of high renown in Brazil ranging from local brands such as "Flamengo" and "Brastemp" to international ones such as the recently granted "Vogue" and "Avon".

With a declaration of high renown at hand, brands will deserve a streamlined examination process at the BPTO against third parties' reproductions or imitations and will have a very powerful enforcement tool to be used in court.

The Brazilian Superior Court of Justice has reinforced several times the special protection afforded to marks of high renown provided that the corresponding declaration is granted by the BPTO.

One question that has recently arisen is whether there should be any limits to such special protection. While it is a fact that protection should not be limited to field of activity, it is still unclear whether the level of distinctiveness of the mark of high renown should play a role in infringement assessments. In other words, should fanciful or arbitrary marks of high renown deserve stronger protection than suggestive renowned marks? The question is still to be answered by our courts but, in the meantime, it is expected that trademark owners will use the judicial enforcement route more and more.

ferreira-de-oliveira-andre.jpg

André Oliveira


Daniel Legal & IP Strategy

Av. República do Chile, 230, 3rd Floor

Centro, Rio de Janeiro 

20031-170, Brazil

Tel: +55 21 2102 4212

www.daniel-ip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Academic Eden Sarid joins us during Pride Month to discuss queer expression and IP law, Patagonia v Pattie Gonia, and how queer and AI-generated creations both pose novelty concerns
Patent attorney Michael Henson joins the firm to lead its freshly launched blockchain and digital assets practice
A dispute over mammogram technology, and a development in the case between GSK and Moderna were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect
Peter O’Sullivan, a professional services executive, says he is looking forward to helping Pearce IP become the leading life sciences firm in Australia and New Zealand
Matteo Di Lernia, advocate at LCA Studio Legale, unpicks the CJEU’s ruling in M.M. Ristorazione v Villa Ramazzini, including its impact on litigation strategies
Leaders at IP boutique say the decision to pursue sponsorless partnership with the specialised investment arm of a private equity firm comes at a time of ‘profound transformation’ in the profession
Patrick Zhang, formerly of Atlassian and TiVo, will become Via’s vice president of licensing and commercial strategy, tasked with helping expand client partnerships and licensing deals
IP services firm says new platform will cut patent portfolio analysis from months to minutes and optimise monetisation efforts
New role for the High Court judge will leave a gap for an IP specialist judge at the first instance
Gift this article