Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Renowned marks gain increasing recognition

Sponsored by

daniel-400px.png

Brazilian IP law believes that renowned marks deserve special protection in all fields of activity. Differently from well-known marks, which are protected within their field of activity and regardless of the existence of a local registration, renowned marks must be registered and then go through a specific proceeding at the BPTO for a declaration of high renown which will be valid for 10 years.

High renown requests were positively affected by the recent BPTO trend to expedite trademark examination bearing in mind the recent accession to the Madrid Protocol. Not only has the BPTO's examination productivity increased, but examiners have also become less stringent about the necessary requirements for marks to be deemed highly renowned.

As a result, there are currently 114 trademarks of high renown in Brazil ranging from local brands such as "Flamengo" and "Brastemp" to international ones such as the recently granted "Vogue" and "Avon".

With a declaration of high renown at hand, brands will deserve a streamlined examination process at the BPTO against third parties' reproductions or imitations and will have a very powerful enforcement tool to be used in court.

The Brazilian Superior Court of Justice has reinforced several times the special protection afforded to marks of high renown provided that the corresponding declaration is granted by the BPTO.

One question that has recently arisen is whether there should be any limits to such special protection. While it is a fact that protection should not be limited to field of activity, it is still unclear whether the level of distinctiveness of the mark of high renown should play a role in infringement assessments. In other words, should fanciful or arbitrary marks of high renown deserve stronger protection than suggestive renowned marks? The question is still to be answered by our courts but, in the meantime, it is expected that trademark owners will use the judicial enforcement route more and more.

ferreira-de-oliveira-andre.jpg

André Oliveira


Daniel Legal & IP Strategy

Av. República do Chile, 230, 3rd Floor

Centro, Rio de Janeiro 

20031-170, Brazil

Tel: +55 21 2102 4212

www.daniel-ip.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A technical effect must still be evident in the original patent filing, the EBoA said in its G2/21 decision today, March 23
Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library