EPO Boards of Appeal chief: revised rules will increase workload
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EPO Boards of Appeal chief: revised rules will increase workload

Carl Josefsson

In an exclusive interview with Managing IP, Carl Josefsson discusses the revised rules of procedure and addresses independence concerns

The president of the EPO’s Boards of Appeal says he is not certain whether the boards’ revised rules of procedure will result in a “front-loading of requests” but has insisted that they should make proceedings more predictable.

Speaking to Managing IP, Carl Josefsson says the revised rules will reduce a party’s options to amend its case as appeal proceedings progress and make it more difficult to withhold submissions for tactical reasons.

However, he confirms the views of some regular users of the system that there will be an increased workload for first instance departments.

“Whether these [the rules] will, in the end, really lead to a ‘precautionary front-loading’ of numerous different lines of argument remains to be seen. After all, procedural economy is in the interests of the parties too,” Josefsson says.

“What can be expected is that to some extent party submissions at first instance will become more comprehensive. It will mainly be up to the departments of first instance to manage the additional workload that this brings.”

Josefsson was reacting to claims from patent attorneys who regularly appear at the EPO and the BoA who told Managing IP that the tightening up of amendments at the appeal stage could result in a precautionary front-loading of requests, amendments and supporting evidence into first instance proceedings.

The revised rules were published at the end of June and will come into effect in January next year. 

In an extensive interview Josefsson also discusses:

·       Further details about the revised rules and their practical impact;

·       The backlog at the BoA and how it is being managed; and

·       Whether the BoA’s independence is improving under the EPO’s new management.

The full interview will be published on Managing IP shortly.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
Lawyers debate whether the Supreme Court’s ruling helps maintain confidence in the trademark system
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The group of lawyers, which includes seven IP partners, say they were impressed by ArentFox Schiff's wide-reaching experience
Andy Sherman, general counsel at Dolby Laboratories, says the company will continue to make GE Licensing’s patents available through existing pools
CMS, which represents Nestlé, had been told to respond to a cancellation action by February 12 but filed its response a day later
Keith Bergelt, CEO of the Open Invention Network, explains why AI technologies were not part of an update to its cross-licensing project
Kirkland & Ellis partners explain how they secured the dismissal of a patent case in which the other side had lied under oath
Managing IP understands the association had been considering other options, including Madrid or Vienna, after concerns were raised over Dubai’s positions on various rights
Chris Marando tells Managing IP that he's excited to work on PTAB matters at Perkins Coie, which recently hired another lawyer from his former firm
Gift this article