Brazil: New programme aims to solve patent backlog

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: New programme aims to solve patent backlog

Sponsored by

daniel-400px.png

The Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has introduced its long-awaited plan to solve its patent backlog, a project called the "Preliminary Standardised Office Action Program". The idea is to reduce backlog by 80% over the next two years – after which the PTO estimates it will take under 24 months to examine new applications.

In recent years, the PTO has committed itself to reducing the backlog through several strategies, such as hiring examiners and creating fast-track programmes. With those efforts, backlog was significantly reduced to about eight years, but it is still a major problem that needs to be addressed. This problem is the reason behind the new programme. This divides applications into three groups:

Group I – applications with a foreign counterpart already examined;

Group II – applications with no foreign counterpart examined;

Group III – applications subject to oppositions, fast-track, already examined by the PTO or Brazilian Food and Drug Administration (FDA), or filed after December 31 2016.

Regarding Group I, the PTO publishes a standardised office action listing the prior art references identified by a foreign patent office. For Group II, the PTO carries out a search and publishes a standardised office action just listing prior art found. In both cases, applicants have 90 days to respond, otherwise applications are dismissed with no right to appeal. Group III follows regular examination.

Standardised office actions come with no technical comments on patentability or formalities. They simply contain a list of prior art: applicants should amend the claims and/or present arguments. Further technical opinions may be later issued on patentability or formalities. However, they are limited to the prior art listed before.

There is an undeniable atmosphere of enthusiasm in the industry regarding the new programme, as it seems to be a game changer for Brazil. If its goals are achieved, the Brazilian PTO will be able to stand on an equal footing with its foreign counterparts in relation to the average patent examination time.

ricardo-nunes.jpg

Ricardo D |Nunes


Daniel Legal & IP Strategy

Av. República do Chile, 

230, 3rd Floor

Centro, Rio de Janeiro 

20031-170, Brazil

Tel: +55 21 2102 4212

www.daniel-ip.com


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Simon Tønners explains why IP provides the chance to work with some of the most passionate, risk-taking, and emotionally invested clients
The co-leaders of the firm’s new SEP practice group say the team will combine litigation and prosecution expertise to guide clients through cross-border challenges
Boasting four former Spruson & Ferguson leaders and with offices in Hong Kong and Singapore, the IP firm aims to provide fast, practical advice to clients
Partners at three law firms explain why trade secrets cases are rising, and how litigation is giving clients a market advantage
Delegates at a conference unpicking the UK’s relationship with the UPC are hopeful of strengthened UK involvement – so should we all be
News of a litigation funder suing its co-founder and a law firm over trade secrets infringement, and a strategic hire by Womble Bond Dickinson were also among the top talking points
Managing IP’s parent company, LBG, will acquire The Lawyer, a leading news, intelligence, and data-driven insight provider for the legal industry, from Centaur Media
In major recent developments, a team of partners broke away from Taylor Wessing to form their own firm, while Kilburn & Strode made a strategic UPC hire
General Court backs Christian Archambeau in some of his challenges against his departure, but dismisses others
Morgan Lewis adds three partners with technical depth, reinforcing the firm’s strategy to bridge legal and tech expertise in patent litigation
Gift this article