Brexit: IP one of the ‘least affected’ areas

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brexit: IP one of the ‘least affected’ areas

AIPPI-2019-Brexit-panel-thumb

Speakers from the UKIPO and Novartis discussed Brexit at the AIPPI World Congress in London, as political protesters gathered outside the Supreme Court just round the corner

AIPPI-2019-Brexit-panel

The panel on Brexit yesterday could not have been more timely: as demonstrators gathered in front of the nearby UK Supreme Court to protest against the temporary suspension of Parliament, the speakers in the QEII Centre kicked off a discussion on how Brexit will affect IP.

Adam Williams, director of international policy at the UKIPO, began the session by telling audience members that his office has been working diligently to ensure a smooth transition for Brexit.

Williams went on to explain that Parliament has only granted his office permission to fix any gaps in legislation and not to tinker with policy changes.

The panellists said patents will be the area of IP least affected by Brexit because of pre-existing international harmonisation.

“Our real focus is trademarks and designs,” Williams said. “After leaving the EU, coverage of these rights will no longer extend to the UK. In the event of no-deal we are committed to giving owners rights similar to the EU rights they had before. Similar arrangements are being made as part of the withdrawal agreement.”

One area of concern for patent owners in the event of a no-deal Brexit is supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

Williams said: “We recognise that while not many are issued, we know how valuable they are to pharmaceutical companies. In the event of a no-deal we will maintain a functioning SPC regime along the lines of the current system with the same rules and same timing periods and rights for those certificates.”

Ewan Nettleton, senior patent counsel for oncology at Novartis in Switzerland, said he was very pleased with all the provisions made by the UKIPO in preparation for Brexit. As SPCs are of particular importance to his industry, he emphasised that many of the same rights will be extended after Brexit.

“For us at Novartis, thanks to Adam’s diligent work, I am here to say we feel less uncomfortable. It appears that IP is one of the least affected areas by Brexit,” he said.

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) was discussed as a potential Brexit-related concern. With the UPC’s fate lingering in Germany’s Constitutional Court, audience members speculated on how the timing of the court’s decision might be affected by Brexit.

Responding to an audience member’s concern, Williams said any conversation about whether or not the UK – which has ratified the UPC Agreement – would be part of an operational UPC would depend on when Germany issues a decision. 

“In a perfect world you will like us to have the discussion while we are in the EU; logically that is a more pleasant environment. If we exit in October … the conversation is in a more different atmosphere. We are sure of the benefits of the UK to be part of the UPC. My experience says if there is a political will you will find a legal solution.”

Nettleton added that from an industry perspective the UPC would be much stronger with UK involvement.

“It was a surprise to me that I heard the UK would still want to participate in the UPC after Brexit. But then again, after Brexit, nothing can surprise you,” he said.

The Congress finishes today.

Image credit: Simon Callaghan Photography

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
A boom in transactional work and a heightened awareness of IP have helped boost revenue for the rebranded commercial services team
Gift this article