All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 Managing IP is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Mexico: Mexico begins to accept non-conventional trademarks

The reform of August 10 2018 to the Mexican Industrial Property Law substantially changed the Mexican trademark landscape. Among the most relevant changes brought by this legislative reform, particularly the acceptance on behalf of the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) of non-conventional trademark applications – such as smell and sound trademarks – positions Mexico today at the forefront of innovation.

Article 88 of the Mexican Industrial Property Law, defines what is generally understood as a trademark. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, the two elements (clarity and precision), are to be transposed, respectively, into the wordings of the representation and the description.

From the perspective of an applicant, a sound mark can be represented by a pentagram, phonogram or onomatopoeia, and it can be described by words that indicate the instruments used in such reproduction, the notes and any other characteristic that defines the sound in question.

When it comes to scent marks, it is a whole different matter. For example, the description may establish what a smell is, so that the exact information regarding the organoleptic characteristics of the sign in question can be transmitted. However, what should the representation contain? And what is the scope of protection of the trademarks in terms of enforcement?

Since the average consumer is unlikely to perceive so many odours and may do so in different ways to the description, the scope of protection will be hard to determine and its enforcement may face obstacles which are not to be underestimated.


María Romero


Pedro Luis Ogazón No 17

Col San Angel

01000 México DF

Tel: +5255 53 22 30 00

Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The executive vice president of partnerships and acquisitions at the NPE explains how his company’s deal with Intel came to be
South Korean lawyers welcome the trademark guidelines but say the appellate board, courts, and other IP offices may not necessarily agree with the KIPO
Lawyers for Craig Wright will seek approval for expert evidence to help the England and Wales High Court understand how autism affects his character
IP counsel say rude judges can dent their confidence but that the effect on clients should not be underestimated
Sources say the Supreme Court’s decision to take on Sky v SkyKick puts uncertainty back into the mix, just when IP owners thought they knew what was what
Charles Feng, partner at East & Concord in Beijing, explains why filing for a trademark early is still a brand’s best bet
Counsel at IBM, Novartis, BMS and four other companies delve into whether the new Section 101 bill addresses their concerns
Clearance searches are especially important when counsel can’t rely on the USPTO’s opinion before key deadlines, say sources
VLSI case halted in Delaware; Netflix sues Bridgerton rip-off; Ex-GSK scientist escapes damages; US Copyright Office debuts new software; Abbvie scores Humira patent thicket win; Russia tables bill on illegal blocking of copyrighted content
An England and Wales High Court judgment over a disclosure error shows why law firms must never play a distant role when advising clients
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree