Greece: Clarity on colour combinations
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: Clarity on colour combinations

It is quite encouraging for law practitioners in Greece that Greek IP specialised courts have managed to align national case law with EU case law on trademarks during the last decade, providing a tool for legal certainty.

A couple of years ago, the IP Specialised Division of the Court of Appeals in Athens delivered judgment No. 1702/2016 on a trademark infringement case where a colour combination was involved. It was held that the word marks under comparison were not confusingly similar. It was further ruled that the accompanying colour combination was not decisive, since the colour combination concerned was found to be descriptive of the relevant goods (over-the-counter pharmaceuticals).

Recently, the General Court was of the same view (T-261/17), when it ruled on a comparison between the same signs applying the same EU case law principle, according to which the public will not consider a descriptive element of a composite mark to be the distinctive and dominant element in the overall impression conveyed by that mark.

This provided a clear – though apparently not complete – answer to the claimant's/opponent's main argument that the figurative elements in the mark applied-for, particularly the combination and configuration of the colours green and white, have an independent distinctive character even if the word element is considered dominant.

It seems that while the competent authorities in each instance (EU and national) regarded the colour combination to be the earlier mark's colour configuration as well, the applicant argued that it used a colour combination in a specific configuration. Thus, what seems to be left unanswered is whether a prima facie descriptive colour combination may have distinctiveness, in cases where the specific colour configuration is not descriptive in and of itself.

The question becomes more intriguing, considering that the specific colour configuration has been registered as a trademark, the validity of which is not questioned.


Manolis Metaxakis

Patrinos & Kilimiris7, Hatziyianni Mexi Str.GR-11528 AthensGreeceTel: +30210 7222906, 7222050Fax: +30210

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

INTA has postponed its planned Annual Meeting in Dubai, but the organisation should think carefully about whether it wants to go there at all
The firm has named its new managing director after its former Asia head resigned earlier this year
As law firms explore how best to support clients at the UPC, members of the UPCLA network believe they have found the best of both worlds
The Industry Patent Quality Charter hosted a conference in which it discussed the importance of granting high-quality patents
Julia Holden explains why, if she weren’t in IP, she would be directing and producing live English-language theatre
The impact of the recently agreed treaty may be modest at first but is likely to become more significant over time
Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
Lawyers debate whether the Supreme Court’s ruling helps maintain confidence in the trademark system
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The group of lawyers, which includes seven IP partners, say they were impressed by ArentFox Schiff's wide-reaching experience
Gift this article